Entries Tagged as ''

Don’t Underestimate the dangers of Motorcycles

Wearing my trauma surgeon hat, I wrote this op-ed piece which printed in today’s Asheville Citizen-Times 

Over the last couple of weeks there’s been a lot of discussion about motorcycles and motorcycle safety here in Asheville and nationwide. As a trauma surgeon, I thought that my input could be useful.

For some numbers, in the year 2005, Mission Hospital admitted 176 motorcycle crash victims. Approximately one-third of these patients required an ICU stay with the range from a couple of hours to 53 days. Just over 60 percent of the patients wore helmets. The overall length of stay for all motorcycle crash victims was twice that of our general trauma population. The median hospital charge was over $17,000. Surprisingly, and this is a testimony to the whole trauma team, out of the 176 patients only four died.

Since mandatory helmet laws have been repealed in many states, this has given trauma surgeons the unique opportunity to study if helmets really make a difference in survival. A recent study in Michigan compared the outcome of patients before the helmet law was repealed to those patients who presented after. The outcome was striking. The number of significant brain injuries dramatically increased and the severity of brain injury also increased. The length of stay in the hospital and in the intensive care unit was longer in those patients without helmets. Significantly more patients who were not wearing helmets required prolonged rehabilitation after their hospitalization. Finally, as expected, the cost of care was significantly more for those patients who did not wear helmets. The conclusion of this study and many others was the helmets protect the brain and save lives.

A 30-year-old female was riding her motorcycle with several of her friends. She was far away from home. She was involved in motorcycle crash. She was found to have a broken pelvis, which required surgery. Her friends stayed around as long as they could but finally had to return home to their own families. This young lady was stranded here in Asheville. She recovered from her surgery and endured her initial postoperative physical therapy, alone until she could be flown home over 1,500 miles away.

A 65-year-old male who rode motorcycles in his “younger” days, was convinced by his grandson, who bought a used motorcycle, to help him fix it up. Once the motorcycle was fixed, he took a ride to make sure everything was in working order. Unfortunately, he was unable to avoid a truck which pulled out in front of him. The resulting crash threw him over 50 feet. He suffered deep abrasions to both arms and legs. He sustained multiple facial fractures and a traumatic head injury. After three days in the intensive care unit his traumatic brain injury continued to worsen in spite of aggressive therapy and multiple surgeries, the patient was declared brain dead.

In the emergency room, the intensive care unit or the trauma care unit, we deal with dramatic stories like these almost on a daily basis. Motorcycles provide almost no protection to the rider. Therefore, even minor motorcycle crashes can cause significant injuries. Deep abrasions resulting from a fall and skidding on concrete are considered a relatively “minor” injury. Patients who have these injuries will attest that they are not minor. As a matter of fact, they cause major pain and disability. They cause multiple trips to the operating room. Some of these abrasions require skin grafting in order for them to heal.

Motorcycles are inherently dangerous. Enthusiasts are extremely vulnerable to bad automobile drivers. Someone can easily pull out of a “hidden” mountain road or stop suddenly. There is very little that even the most extremely conscientious motorcycle rider can do.

Motorcycle riders can decrease the chance of injury or death by doing a few things:

• Take a motorcycle safety course

• Be conscientious and thoughtful while riding

• Wear leathers (this decreases the chance and the severity of abrasions)

• Always wear a full helmet with a face safety shield

• For more information, please check out the following Web sites — The National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/pedbimot/motorcycle/motosafety.html) and the Motorcycle Safety Foundation (http://www.msf-usa.org/)

First Portion of the Declaration of Independence

When in the Course of human events, it becomeDeclaration of Indepedences necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

Have a happy and safe July 4th!!

Olbermann gives O’Reilly da’ beatdown

O’Reilly was flappin’ his lips again.  He was talking about Air America Radio going under and MSNBC failing.  Well, it seems that the ratings are on Keith’s side.  Bill is losing market share.  Keith was only to happy to point out that his show is killing the Factor in the ratings.  The Factor has lost over a quarter of a million viewers over the last year.  Wow.  Looks like the ship is sinking.  Look for more crazy stuff from O’Reilly as he tries to right a sinking vessel.

 
icon for podpress  Olbermann taking O'Reilly to the woodshed [3:36m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Rep. Susan Fisher’s Report from Raleigh

My colleagues and I were busy on numerous fronts this week. Members of the House and Senate started negotiations on the budget on Tuesday and their work will continue through next week as we try to reach an agreement on the spending plan for the next fiscal year, which begins July 1. We passed legislation on important “non-budget” issues such as cracking down on sex offenders, campaign finance reform and protecting veterans and our military from identity theft. We also had a little “sports” fun on Wednesday and Thursday when we were lucky enough to have the Carolina Hurricanes and Olympic gold medalist Joey Cheek of Greensboro visit the General Assembly.

More here

Feingold on MTP

The more that I see and read about Russ Feingold the more that I like him.  He is thoughtful and practical.  He is not afraid of the GOP.  He knows when he is right and when to force the issue.  Tim is throwing 95 mph fastballs at him and Senator Feingold is knocking them out of the park.  Iraq and the phased pull out, Cheney’s comments about Democrats suggesting a pull out even a question about Lieberman - Feingold was perfect.

Thanks to CL and Think Progress for the clip (I can’t remember which one I got this one from).

 
icon for podpress  Feingold on Meet the Press [7:01m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Gitmo Trials Illegal

President BushThe Supreme Court in an interesting 5 - 3 ruling stated that the Bush Administration had overstepped its bounds and that Military War Crimes trials violates the constituion and the Geneva Convention. 

I can pretend to be a lawyer and discuss the technical aspects of this case.  But it ends up sounding like a doctor trying to be a lawyer.  Glen Greenwald gives a complete rundown on this decision. 

Think Progress posted this -

Justice Breyer stated in today’s Hamdan opinion, “Nothing prevents the President from returning to Congress to seek the authority he believes necessary.” Reacting to Breyer, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said on Fox, “The court is telling us that tribunals would be okay if you have the Congress’ blessing.”

President Bush seems to be quickly embracing the idea.

As I understand, a senator has already been on TV — I haven’t seen it. I haven’t heard what he said, but they briefed me and said he wants to devise law in conformity with the case that would enable us to use a military tribunal to hold these people to account. And if that’s the case, we’ll work with him.

But if Bush truly wants to devise law in conformity with the opinion, the military commissions will need to undergo significant changes. Mere congressional authorization of the military commission that the Bush administration has conceived will not be enough to pass the legal test. Today’s Supreme Court opinion makes clear that a congressionally-authorized military commission would need to comply with Geneva Conventions, particularly Common Article 3. From the opinion:

Common Article 3, then, is applicable here and, as indicated above, requires that Hamdan be tried by a “regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.”

The commentary accompanying a provision of the Fourth Geneva Convention, for example, defines “‘regularly constituted’” tribunals to include “ordinary military courts” and “definitely exclud[e] all special tribunals.

Common Article 3 obviously tolerates a great degree of flexibility in trying individuals captured during armed conflict; its requirements are general ones, crafted to accommodate a wide variety of legal systems. But requirements they are nonetheless. The commission that the President has convened to try Hamdan does not meet those requirements.

In other words, Bush’s military commissions need more than a rubber-stamp from Congress.

More later…

Supreme Court gives DeLay some support

In a 5-4 ruling the Supreme Court upheld portions of the re-districting plan in Texas.  They did declare that a west Texas district was really painfully redrawn diluted the Latino vote and was unconstitutional.  (This district will have to be redrawn and approved before the November election.)  That is the only thing in the ruling that is clear to me.  The rest of the ruling seems to be several different decisions that really don’t help to decide anything.  Just to prove that concensus was lacking, 7 different opinions were written.  Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Il.) Chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, “Every redistricting is a partisan political exercise, but this is going to put it at a level we have never seen. That’s the gift that the Supreme Court and Tom DeLay have given us.”  Look for states to begin re-drawing districts left and right (pun intended).

I look forward to reading Glenn Greenwald’s take on this. 

Representative Susan Fisher’s Update

Representative Susan Fisher’s Report from Raleigh
My colleagues and I were busy on numerous fronts this week. Members of the House and Senate started negotiations on the budget on Tuesday and their work will continue through next week as we try to reach an agreement on the spending plan for the next fiscal year, which begins July 1. We passed legislation on important “non-budget” issues such as cracking down on sex offenders, campaign finance reform and protecting veterans and our military from identity theft. We also had a little “sports” fun on Wednesday and Thursday when we were lucky enough to have the Carolina Hurricanes and Olympic gold medalist Joey Cheek of Greensboro visit the General Assembly.Please remember that you can listen to each day’s session, committee meetings and press conferences on the General Assembly’s website at www.ncleg.net. Once on the site, select “audio,” and then make your selection – i.e. House Chamber, Senate Chamber, Appropriations Committee Room or Press Conference Room.

Budget Update

Budget conferees were named by Speaker Jim Black, D-Mecklenburg, and Senate President Pro Tem Marc Basnight, D-Dare, on Monday night, which officially started negotiations between the two chambers on a final budget. I was appointed as a conferee to the subcommittee on Education.

Negotiators from the House and Senate appear to have reached a compromise on many differences in their respective budget bills during negotiations this week, but relief for counties with high Medicaid expenses, salary increases, education funding, tax cuts and whether non-budget policy provisions should stay in the final budget bill all remain on the table. The House budget set aside $53 million for counties to pay their Medicaid expenses, but the Senate had none. The Senate offered a compromise Wednesday in which it would agree to pay $20 million. Negotiators of the roughly $19 billion budget also haven’t finalized how to spend money toward a special fund for at-risk students and poor school districts.

House and Senate finance leaders still must work out the scope of the reductions in two “temporary” tax increases passed in 2001 during the recession that are set to expire next year. The two chambers agreed in their budgets to reduce the state sales tax by a quarter cent, but they differ on how far the individual income tax should decrease for top wage earners. The House wants to provide a tax credit to small businesses that offer health insurance to employees; the Senate did not include this credit in their budget. The two sides also differ on whether most state employees should receive a $300 bonus to go with a permanent 5 percent raise. Legislative leaders want to reach a final agreement before next Tuesday so that it can be voted on and sent to Governor Easley for his signature by June 30, when the current fiscal year ends.

House Cracks Down on Sex Offenders

House members unanimously approved legislation (HB 1896) on Tuesday that would prohibit sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school, day care center or public swimming pool. The bill would require sex offenders to register in person with the sheriff of the county, give annual verification of address and notification of changes in address. Further, if a convicted sex offender works or attends school in another county, they must also register with that second county’s sheriff.

The bill adds to the list of offenses that require sex offender registration by including statutory rape of a person who is 13, 14 or 15 years old by a person who is at least six years older than the victim. Other provisions make it a felony for someone to knowingly harbor an unregistered sexual offender, and authorize sheriff’s deputies to obtain updated photographs when they believe an offender’s appearance has changed. The state Department of Motor Vehicles would conduct background checks on new residents before issuing a driver’s license.

The legislation, which now goes to the Senate for consideration, is one of several sex offender enforcement bills that were recommended by the House Select Committee on Sex Offender Registration Laws which met prior to the start of the short session. The House budget included $1.5 million to upgrade the state’s sex offender registry, implement a global positioning system to monitor the most serious convicted sex offenders, and to establish an email notification program so citizens can be notified when a registered sex offender moves into their neighborhood.

Protecting Veterans Against Identity Theft

The House approved legislation on Thursday (HB 2883) that would protect veterans, active duty military and members of the National Guard against identity theft. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Bruce Goforth, D-Buncombe, in response to the news of a recent theft of a federal government database in Washington, D.C. that included the names, Social Security numbers and birthdates of 26.5 million veterans across the nation.

Under existing North Carolina law, any victim of identity theft can get a free credit freeze, which prohibits access to that person’s account history. Some states allow consumers to pay for a credit freeze before encountering fraud, but haven’t committed to offering any similar services for free. North Carolina veterans would have until the end of the year to initiate the service and could keep it at no charge for up to a year. The bill was unanimously approved on Thursday.

North Carolina is home to more than 770,000 veterans and 90,000 active duty members of the military. Surviving spouses of military personnel can also get a credit freeze under the proposal, and family members can act on behalf of active-duty personnel overseas.

Veterans who suspect identity theft should call (800) FED-INFO or (800) 333-4636 or go to: www.firstgov.gov/veteransinfo.shtml.

House Passes Campaign Finance Bill

Members of the House approved legislation (HB 1845) that provides additional requirements on how campaign funds may be used, including barring political candidates from using campaign contributions for personal use. The measure would limit a candidate or campaign committee to spending in seven specific areas including running for and holding public office, gifts to charities, contributions to other campaigns, and paying penalties for election law violations. The bill was recommended due to several former legislators who spent donations on personal uses, including Rep. Joni Bowie (R-Guilford) who spent more than $16,000 on a car and computer after losing re-election in 2004.

North Carolina is one of only about 10 states that doesn’t limit how politicians spend campaign funds while running for office or after they leave office, said Rep. Deborah Ross, D-Wake, one of the bill’s sponsors. The bill is one of 10 recommendations from the House Select Committee on Ethics and Governmental Reform, which met prior to the start of this year’s short session.

The bill would take effect on October 1, 2006. Bob Hall, research director for Democracy North Carolina, a campaign finance watchdog, supports the ban, but said starting the ban during an election season – i.e. on October 1, 2006 – and before campaign treasurers are required to get training, creates a situation where someone could unknowingly violate a law that carries a misdemeanor penalty. An amendment, supported by Hall and sponsored by Rep. Mickey Michaux, D-Durham, to change the effective date to January 1, 2007 failed by a vote of 44-70.

The House gave initial approval of the bill on Wednesday by a vote of 107-8 and final approval on Thursday, 104-5. It now moves to the Senate for consideration.

Assistance for Law Enforcement Officers

House Bill 447, Law Enforcement Officers Creditable Service/Workers’ Compensation, passed the House on Thursday and will now be sent to the Governor for signature into law. This bill, long sought by law enforcement groups, provides that any officer injured by the criminal act of a third party and forced out of work because of that injury for a period of time, will now have that time out on workers’ compensation count towards his or her retirement. This eliminates the double penalty that had existed for injured local officers who were out of work and also losing time towards their retirement when seriously hurt by a criminal. The bill was supported by the North Carolina Police Benevolent Association, other law enforcement groups and the League of Municipalities as well as the Association of County Commissioners.

General Assembly Honors Carolina Hurricanes and Olympic Gold Medalist Joey Cheek

The Stanley Cup champion Carolina Hurricanes were honored at the General Assembly on Wednesday by members of the House and Senate during a special joint session. Close to 30 Hurricanes players and Coach Peter Laviolette came into the House chamber to raucous applause following their second victory parade in as many days. Defenseman Bret Hedican got the biggest cheers — and a lot of camera flashes — when he raised the Stanley Cup over his head and placed it on the House dais beside of Speaker Jim Black. Carolina won the NHL title Monday night by beating the Edmonton Oilers 3-1 in the final game of a seven-game series, bringing the first big-league professional sports championship to North Carolina.

On Thursday, legislators honored Greensboro native and Olympic medalist Joey Cheek who won a gold medal in the 500 meter race and silver medal in the 1,000 meter race during the 2006 Winter Olympics. He won his first medal during the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City by capturing the bronze for his third-place finish in the 1,000 meter event. Cheek has traveled the world, including Darfur, to promote the “Right to Play” charity, which helps children in disadvantaged nations grow and develop through sports. He donated his winnings from the Olympics to the charity.

Women’s Advocacy DayOn Tuesday, more than a hundred women participated in Women’s Advocacy Day, an annual event hosted by North Carolina Women United. At a morning news conference, Lt. Gov. Beverly Perdue, along with several House members and N.C. Women United leaders, advocated for women’s and family issues. The speakers urged lawmakers to raise the minimum wage, increase health care access for families, provide adequate funding for rape crisis centers and pass lobbying reform. They also encouraged more women to become engaged in the political process. N.C. Women United is a nonprofit coalition of more than 40 organizations working to achieve equality for women in North Carolina.

The North Carolina Association of Realtors, Inc. visited the General Assembly on Wednesday to advocate for a strong real estate industry through an increase in the N.C. Housing Trust Fund and to oppose some provisions of the Senate stormwater management bill. One provision, dealing with the percentage of a tract of land that may be developed without installing engineered stormwater controls. The NCAR contends this legislation would be economically devastating to development in coastal areas.

The Apartment Association of North Carolina came to discuss methamphetamine labs in rental housing and why legislation should be passed to prosecute the perpetrator in these crimes rather than any “responsible party” including the owner. The AANC promotes the interests of persons, firms, and corporations who develop, own, or manage multi-family residential housing.

**************************
The House will be back in session on Monday night at 6 pm.

As I’ve said many times before, I hope you will continue to let me know how you feel about the issues that are being debated by the North Carolina Legislature and the challenges you and your family are facing each day.

By working together, we can make Buncombe and all regions of North Carolina a better place to live, work and raise a family.

Found a great NC progressive blog

http://thesoutherndem.blogspot.com/  Any blog that discusses supporting Mel Watt and Larry Kissel in the same post is okay in my book.  This post is really a report on the NC Democratic Convention

Where’s the Outrage podcast 6-24-06

joe-cirincione Wheres the Outrage podcast 6-24-06So, I had nothing to talk about this week.  Nothing at all…Well, there was the announcement by Sen. Santorum.  The House debates the Paris Hilton Tax.  Well, it wasn’t a real debate.  It was more name calling.  Nancy Pelosi and Rep Doggert (D-Tx) have some great things to say.  I interview Joseph Cirincione from the Center for American Progress.  He is a expert on nuclear weapons and terrorism.  He gives us the scoop on Sen Santorum and also announces the results of their Terrorism Survey

 
icon for podpress  Where's the Outrage 6-24-06 [49:02m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Cool Video

Being on call at night (Saturday) is a trip. One would be amazed at the stuff that I see. Like the song says, “The freaks come out at night.”

I found this totally cool video. I love the animation. The techo-music is kinda cool also. I’m working on figuring out how to embed a Google Vid into my posts. I have tried 2 plugins and they both have failed. So, I’m bummin’. Anyway, enjoy the vid - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1664251905722817993&pr=goog-sl

I will be back to discussing illegal wiretaps, on-going violence in Iraq and Israel, Vice President Cheney’s boastful and unsupported claims, the Miami seven, no effective policy to confront North Korea or Iran and the stalemate on immigration - soon.

 
icon for podpress  Starship Groove [3:02m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Odd Telephone Call

Yesterday, after being up all night, I was paying some bills online when the telephone rang. I answered the phone and the lady told me that she was not soliciting anything but was from an organization called DOVE. She then began to ask me if my wife was at home and I said no. She then asked me if I thought pinky and the Brainthere was enough children and family oriented programming on TV. Now remember, I had been up all night and I was really focusing on the balancing act that occurs when you have more bills than you have money. I then snapped out of my daze. It dawned on me that there are tons of family programs on TV now. There’s Nickelodeon, Nick at Night, Nick Jr., the Boomerang Channel, the Cartoon Network (remember that some of those cartoons are not children oriented), Animal Planet, ABC family, HBO family, Nick Toons, Noggin’, Toon Disney, Disney and Discovery Kids. There are probably a dozen sports channels which may not be very interesting to some very young children but to others they would be fine. So, are we at 20 channels now? Oh, and I forgot PBS kids. But before I could ask about any of the aforementioned and television shows she began her spiel about the Hollywood elite and their agenda against families. Then I asked her a simple question, “Isn’t Cars, a family oriented cartoon, the number one movie in the country?” (Adam Sandler’s new movie, Click, is the new box office king this week. Cars was king for the previous two weeks. Cars and Garfield are both in the top 10.) She then replied something like I don’t support families and then hung up.

I don’t understand.  I grew up in the 70s.  In Dallas we had five possibly six channels to choose from.  Children’s programming was on from three in the afternoon until five in the afternoon on 2 of the channels.  Children’s programming also came on on Saturday morning from about eight in the morning until about 11 in the morning.  That was it.  There was nothing else.  But yet, this lady was trying to tell me that there’s less selection now.  Well, that was simply a lie.  Television is different today than it was in the 70s.  The big three television networks dominated the airwaves back then.  Now that is not true.  With cable and satellite, that clearly is not true.  I won’t even mention the other forms of entertainment that are available today like VHS, DVD’s, iPods and the Internet.  All of these entertainment devices or mediums have plenty of children programming.

So what exactly did this person really want?  How many more channels needed to be “family-oriented” before she would be happy?  Maybe she wanted the same thing that Brain wants in the Animanic’s cartoon, Pinky and the Brain.  Maybe she wanted to “control the world.”

support them!

Just hours ago, the Senate voted on the Kerry-Feingold proposal to redeploy American combat troops out of Iraq by July 1, 2007. Thirteen Senators voted for it.

Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-HI)
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), co-sponsor
Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL)
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA)
Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI)
Sen. James Jeffords (I-VT)
Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA)
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), co-sponsor
Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ)
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)

Gabi

 

NC Democratic Party Convention in High Point

Impeachment Resolution

RESOLUTION ASKING NC LEGISLATORS TO FILE IMPEACHMENT ARTICLES     

Whereas Section 603 of section LIII of Jefferson’s Rules of the US House rules for the 109th Congress permits the inception of impeachment proceedings by charges transmitted from the legislature of a state; and

Section 603 of section LIII of Jefferson’s Rules of the US House rules for the 109th Congress permits the inception of impeachment proceedings by charges transmitted from the legislature of a state; and 

Whereas George W. Bush, President of the United States, has so conducted himself and his administration as to cause the people of the State of North Carolina to doubt his integrity and to believe that his official actions as president are subject to corrupt influences; and

Whereas the North Carolina Democratic Party has passed a resolution calling for the impeachment of George W. Bush; and

Whereas the North Carolina State Executive Committee also voted for the impeachment of George W. Bush, Richard Cheney and Alberto Gonzales in January 2006; therefore, 

the North Carolina State Executive Committee also voted for the impeachment of George W. Bush, Richard Cheney and Alberto Gonzales in January 2006; therefore, 

Be it resolved that this North Carolina Democratic Party convention asks our Representatives in the State of North Carolina (the senate concurring) to petition the US House of Representatives to start investigations of George W. Bush and his administration to the end that George W. Bush may be impeached and removed from office, and in doing so to follow the example set by California Assemblyman Paul Koretz in his submission of impeachment resolutions; and

Be it further resolved that the Secretary of State for North Carolina give, and is hereby instructed to certify, to each Senator and Representative in the Congress of the United States, under the great seal of the State of North Carolina, a copy of this resolution and the prior impeachment resolution, and notification of its adoption by the Democratic Party of the State of North Carolina at their convention in June 2006. 

That the Secretary of State for North Carolina give, and is hereby instructed to certify, to each Senator and Representative in the Congress of the United States, under the great seal of the State of North Carolina, a copy of this resolution and the prior impeachment resolution, and notification of its adoption by the Democratic Party of the State of North Carolina at their convention in June 2006. 

It passed!!!  Now we all have to lobby our state representatives and senators to get going on this!

 

Kos under Fire

I guess this is one of those things that come with notoriety.  If they are not talking about you than you are not significant… I guess.  The first time I noted the DailyKos in the mass media was a comment that was made on the Bill O’Reilly’s show, the Factor, if I’m not mistaken (it could have been Sean Hannity - aren’t they basically the same?).  This happened about three to four weeks ago.  Since then, Markos Moulitsas, founder of the DailyKos, has shown up in the national media on multiple occasions.  Unfortunately, most of those occasions have been to paint him or portray him as a far left wing lunatic.  Today is no different.  David Brooks of the New York Times has written a column devoted to portraying Markos as some dictatorial leader who has “squadrons of rabid lambs” at his beck and call.

I’m surprised that David Brooks would stoop this low.  He is talking about a world which he really has no firsthand knowledge — as far as I can tell.  I have no idea how much time David Brooks spends reading the DailyKos.  As far as I know he has never posted a response on a progressive web site. 

Markos appears to me to be a thoughtful and responsible progressive activist.  He appears to be passionate about the progressive movement.  He is extremely knowledgeable and reads a ton of material to keep informed.  The fact that he and Jerome Armstrong (MyDD) agree on a lot of topics should be no mystery anyone.  They are friends.  They have spent the last three to four years talking about politics.  Writing about politics.  Trying to find a viable strategy for progressives to win.  Who would be surprised that they seem to back the same candidates?

If they’re talking about you that means you’re making a difference.  Keep on making a difference Markos!!

Santorum Grabbin’ for straws

Think Progess does a better job of debunking this than I could.  I will say that Santorum is way behind in his Senate Race.  He needs something big to swing support his way. 

From Think Progress:

Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) took to the microphone today to announce a shocking discovery — that WMD have been found in Iraq:

Congressman Hoekstra and I are here today to say that we have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons. … Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq’s pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist.

The Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to determine whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq. After a year and half of meticulously combing through the country, here’s what the administration’s own inspectors reported:

While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible Indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered.

The White House should immediately announce whether it stands with Santorum or whether it stands behind the review conducted by Charles Duelfer and the Iraq Survey Group. Recall, in October 2004, Bush said of Duelfer’s analysis:

The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there.

Fox News isn’t waiting for an administration statement. Their right wing pundits are already peddling the story as truth. Host John Gibson: “Sen. Rick Santorum announcing a startling find … In fact, WMDs were found in Iraq.”

 

 
icon for podpress  Santorum on H&C [3:42m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Da’ Daily Show

Ken Melman, chairman of the Republican Party, is on The Daily Show. Jon asks how did the Republicans become parsers. The answer was surprisingly honest. Honesty in politics. How crazy is that?

 
icon for podpress  The Daily Show - Ken Melman [7:37m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Spring Newsletter

With my new radio show, I have not had the time to write my newsletter. A monthly newsletter is more than I can tackle at this time. Quarterly, may be more realistic.

Do you remember that TV clip in faded color with Vince Lombardi, the famous Hall of Fame coach of the Green Bay Packers, furiously pacing up and down the sideline exclaiming, “What the h%## is going on out there?” When I look at the political scene, I feel like Coach Vince.

This week we learned that our President may have authorized the leak of CIA agent’s Valerie Plame’s name to the press. This is the same President who has railed against White House leaks and promised that no lawbreakers will remain on his staff.

# # # # #

Tom DeLay has announced that he will not seek re-election. DeLay blames “liberal democrats” for his downfall. Let’s see…. DeLay’s very close friend Jack Abramoff has been found guilty of illegal lobbying practices. Two of the congressman’s former aides have been indicted and are cooperating with prosecutors. A third DeLay aide has plead guilty and it looks like Congressman Bill Ney (R-Oh) is the next target of the investigation. Of course, none of these events could have caused DeLay to step down. It was the liberal democrats.

# # # # #

The President has told us, in a press conference several weeks ago, that it is tough in Iraq, but he is confident of victory. The press, he tells us, is just reporting the bad news and none of the good. Well, we know that thousands of airplanes land at hundreds of airports across the US every day. This is not news. The plane that has a near miss or crashes makes the news. We all know this. The fact that our soldiers have erected a new school in Iraq is nice; but the ceiling fans in that school were originally supposed to be a nice air conditioning unit. Government contractors took so much money out of the project that the school only gets a cheap fan… now, that’s news. Other news in Iraq has not been good. Five months after their historic general election, the Iraqis have finally formed a new government but have yet to pass a single law or done anything to prove that they can govern.

All of this political gridlock is playing out against the background of ongoing violence in Iraq. Another bomb was exploded, destroying a mosque, killing seventy and injuring hundreds. Every week there is a new atrocity. Suicide bombers. Roadside explosives. The UN embassy is attacked. A busload of children is blown up. All the while Donald Rumsfeld is telling us that Iraq is not undergoing a civil war. And all the while the casualty list of American soldiers in Iraq gets longer. Are the American people becoming numb to the violence? Perhaps they should visit websites such as http://www.newslink.com/uscasualties.htm, where they can find the names of those who have died “in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom,” or www.thefinalrollcall.us, where they can see the faces of the fallen. Are we becoming accustomed to the insanity of this debacle? How many Americans know that Russia was giving Saddam intelligence information–troop movements and other satellite information–during the initial phases of Operation Iraqi Freedom? I thought Putin was someone our President could “do business with.”

# # # # #

The immigration debate is less a debate than it is a World Wrestling Federation exhibition. The House passed a measure back in December that is really nothing more than building a 700-mile wall along the Mexican border. The House seems to be posturing very much like WWF performers do prior to matches, daring the Senate to pass anything other than an enforcement bill. The Senate bill sponsored by majority leader Bill Frist, was an enforcement bill much like the House bill—look what happened to that. McCain-Kennedy proposed a compromise bill which was more comprehensive. There appeared to be a deal in the making. Then the American people got body-slammed. Republicans came out pointing fingers at the Democrats. The Democrats called foul and accused the Republicans of killing the deal. The bottom-line is that there is no referee for this free-for-all, except us, the citizens. Thankfully, the least likely among us have stood up. More rallies with tens of thousands in the streets of Dallas, Los Angeles, Chicago and many other cities across our county. Non-violent marches. We have told our Senators to deal and to do so now. Our President has gotten behind the bandwagon so that he could lead us. His primetime speech was a jewel of tepidness. It was meant to please the right, the left and the middle. As far as I can tell it pleased nobody. The real fight is going to happen behind closed doors where no snooping reporters or angry protesters can influence the outcome. The compromise between the House and Senate versions of this immigration bill will truly be where the rubber meets the road.

“What the h$#* is going on out there [in Washington]?”

  • The budget deficit continues to climb in spite of promises of fiscal restraint. Congress recessed without passing any portion of the budget (if the budget is not passed, more than likely Congress will spend more and not less money). The House did pass a measure to raise the debt ceiling…again.
  • Iran and Washington are staring each other down waiting for the other to blink first.
  • Condolezza Rice echoing her Iraq rhetoric, “Iran is currently the greatest threat to the US.”
  • The Iranian Ambassador to the US gloats, “We can cause the US pain!”

I just have one question, “Where are the adults?”

* with writing assistance from Catherine Ross, PhD.  

 

Sorry for not posting anything today but…

I love politics and the thought process that goes into making policy.  Unfortunately, my day job is that of a trauma surgeon.  I’m on nights now.  This is a very busy time of year.  I’ll post as often as I can.

What’s up with this arrest of these 7 guys from MiamiTerrorists?  Maybe but it doesn’t look like it right now.  I’m not sure that the government has anything expect some dudes with a murky future and impoverished past.  I did find it interesting that Bush has a “big” week last week and his poll numbers thats a small bump.  Then we learn about Ron Suskind’s book which is not flattering to the White House.  He tells of this complex plot to inject poison gas into the subways of NY.  The plot is disrupted by the CIA…FBI…no Al Qaeda!!  They called it off and no one knows why.  The cell is probably still here in the US.  Well, this isn’t good news for the White House.  So, they need something….something to keep the momentum going.  The immigration bill is dead in the joint House and Senate committee.  The Paris Hilton tax is also going nowhere fast.  The Senate has already killed it.  North Korea woke up after several months of calm and decided to rattle President Bush’s cage.  They are going to test fire a 2-stage rocket.  More evidence of more spying on Americans.  The government is looking at overseas transactions…sort of.  They are looking at domestic transactions that go thru an overseas Bank.  This way they can spy on Americans but not in American.  (I think I’m going to be ill.) So, what’s a White House in desperate need of a good story going to do?  I’m just saying…

That’s all for now. 

Wiretapping your phone and mine

I wrote this article and submitted it as an op-ed piece.  It was published in the Asheville Citizen Times on February 14, 2006.

————————-

For several weeks now, Americans have been aware that our government is eavesdropping upon our private communications, calling these activities a “terrorist surveillance program.” These invasions of our privacy, we are told, have all been in the name of homeland security and have been characterized as part of President Bush’s war on terrorism. I’m only a physician, not a spy, but I cannot believe we have come to this.

Since the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001, the specially appointed Sept. 11 Commission as well as a House and Senate Joint Intelligence Committee on Sept. 11, 2001, have investigated this act of terrorism as well as our intelligence-gathering system. Both groups have had much to say. Our intelligence community has been inefficient, poorly organized and ill-equipped in general. Looking back specifically at what led to Sept. 11, these study groups have identified a number of signs we missed or misread, bits of evidence we did not take seriously enough, instances of poor communication between government agencies and failures to properly interpret the intelligence that was being gathered prior to the attack on Sept. 11.

One of their most worrisome findings is the fact that the powerful government agencies charged with protecting Americans from terrorism — the CIA, FBI, National Security Agency and State Department — were not working cooperatively. In all the pages of recommendations made by the Sept. 11 Commission and the House and Senate Joint Intelligence Committee, however, there was not one suggestion that our government should secretly violate the privacy of its citizens by eavesdropping upon their telephone calls and e-mail.

In order to prevent the government from misconstruing or abusing its powers, our Founding Fathers adopted the Bill of Rights in 1789.

It would seem, however, that in the year 2006, in the name of homeland security and with frightening language about the possibility of another terrorist attack on U.S. soil, our government is coming very close to violating several of the rights that are basic to American democracy.

The First Amendment addresses the right to free speech, the Fourth Amendment assures citizens that their privacy will not be violated without due cause, and even the Sixth Amendment, which addresses criminal trials, requires that the accused be confronted with the witnesses against them.

Does secretly eavesdropping on American citizens’ conversations square with these constitutional provisions?

I would imagine that most Americans are like me — we don’t want any more Sept. 11s, and we are satisfied that the official criticisms of the agencies in our government charged with protecting our security and the recommendations for improving our intelligence community, listed below, make a lot of sense:

• Both the Sept. 11 Commission and the House and Senate Joint Intelligence Committee found that neither the U.S. government nor the intelligence community had developed a comprehensive strategy for dealing with Osama bin Laden or al-Qaida.

• Both groups noted that the intelligence community was not well organized or well-equipped to combat global terrorists with targets inside the United States.

• They recognized that our intelligence community is not prepared to handle the volume of foreign-language data that comes in relating to terrorism.

• They recommended that we combine strategic intelligence and operational planning against international terrorists by creating a National Counterterrorism Center.

• They recommended that we unify the intelligence community under a new national intelligence director and develop mechanisms to share information among all the arms of government that participate in counterterrorism.

Let me repeat, however, that nowhere in their analysis or recommendations did either study group mention, much less suggest, warrantless eavesdropping on American citizens.

Even if a good case for governmental eavesdropping could be made, does the evidence we now have about the events leading up to Sept. 11 suggest that a measure such as this could have prevented the murder and destruction that took place that day?

I don’t think so.

Writing assistance by Catherine Ross, PhD.