Entries Tagged as ''

General Odom points out the errors in Right Wing arguments

Photo:API missed this OpEd in WaPo last week.  The OpEd by General Odom was titled - Victory Is Not an Option.  Well, I guess one could argue that no more needed to be said.  General Odom then lays out why we can’t accomplish the mission, point by point.  (William E. Odom, a retired Army lieutenant general, was head of Army intelligence and director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan. He served on the National Security Council staff under Jimmy Carter. A West Point graduate with a PhD from Columbia, Odom teaches at Yale and is a fellow of the Hudson Institute.)

————

The new National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq starkly delineates the gulf that separates President Bush’s illusions from the realities of the war. Victory, as the president sees it, requires a stable liberal democracy in Iraq that is pro-American. The NIE describes a war that has no chance of producing that result. In this critical respect, the NIE, the consensus judgment of all the U.S. intelligence agencies, is a declaration of defeat.

Its gloomy implications — hedged, as intelligence agencies prefer, in rubbery language that cannot soften its impact — put the intelligence community and the American public on the same page. The public awakened to the reality of failure in Iraq last year and turned the Republicans out of control of Congress to wake it up. But a majority of its members are still asleep, or only half-awake to their new writ to end the war soon.

Perhaps this is not surprising. Americans do not warm to defeat or failure, and our politicians are famously reluctant to admit their own responsibility for anything resembling those un-American outcomes. So they beat around the bush, wringing hands and debating “nonbinding resolutions” that oppose the president’s plan to increase the number of U.S. troops in Iraq.

For the moment, the collision of the public’s clarity of mind, the president’s relentless pursuit of defeat and Congress’s anxiety has paralyzed us. We may be doomed to two more years of chasing the mirage of democracy in Iraq and possibly widening the war to Iran. But this is not inevitable. A Congress, or a president, prepared to quit the game of “who gets the blame” could begin to alter American strategy in ways that will vastly improve the prospects of a more stable Middle East.

No task is more important to the well-being of the United States. We face great peril in that troubled region, and improving our prospects will be difficult. First of all, it will require, from Congress at least, public acknowledgment that the president’s policy is based on illusions, not realities. There never has been any right way to invade and transform Iraq. Most Americans need no further convincing, but two truths ought to put the matter beyond question:

First, the assumption that the United States could create a liberal, constitutional democracy in Iraq defies just about everything known by professional students of the topic. Of the more than 40 democracies created since World War II, fewer than 10 can be considered truly “constitutional” — meaning that their domestic order is protected by a broadly accepted rule of law, and has survived for at least a generation. None is a country with Arabic and Muslim political cultures. None has deep sectarian and ethnic fissures like those in Iraq.

Strangely, American political scientists whose business it is to know these things have been irresponsibly quiet. In the lead-up to the March 2003 invasion, neoconservative agitators shouted insults at anyone who dared to mention the many findings of academic research on how democracies evolve. They also ignored our own struggles over two centuries to create the democracy Americans enjoy today. Somehow Iraqis are now expected to create a constitutional order in a country with no conditions favoring it. [Read more →]

Insurgents have plans

There seems to be an idea that is floating around space that insurgents are a bunch of morons running around without a clue.  I have thought for sometime that this perception is 100% WRONG.  The insurgents have killed innocents, women and child but for the most part they have worked with purpose.  Here’s a short list of what I think has been a thoughtful overall strategy -

  • Bombing the UN, removes world support
  • Targeting coalition forces, removes whatever allies we had
  • Selectively target Americans
  • Now we learn that they have figured out how to target our helicopters

From NYT:

Documents captured from Iraqi insurgents indicate that some of the recent fatal attacks against American helicopters are a result of a carefully planned strategy to focus on downing coalition aircraft, one that American officials say has been carried out by mounting coordinated assaults with machine guns, rockets and surface-to-air missiles.

The documents, said to have been drafted by Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, show that the militants were preparing to “concentrate on the air force.” The contents of the documents are described in an American intelligence report that was reviewed by The New York Times. [Read more →]

Workin’ day and night

Glenn GreenwaldEvery now and then, it seems that I work.  I go to meetings.  I blog and I sleep.  Well, yesterday there just wasn’t enough hours in the day.  So, there was no blogging yesterday.  There really wasn’t much sleeping either.  Anyway, after some sleep, I hope that I can do some blogging. 

I forgot to mention that Glenn Greenwald of Unclaimed Territory and author and a new gig.  He is blogging at Salon.  Glenn has been very different than most bloggers.  He has gone out of his way to type thoughtful, detailed posts.  He links to excellent sources.  His posts are usually long which if you read the “how to blog” smart guys they tell you not to post long rants.  Oops.  They were 100% wrong when it comes to Glenn.  Glen has already had some great posts.  I wish him well at his new home.