“Trial, no big deal” says the right

Conservatives and neoconservatives have been trying to whitewash the Scooter Libby trial ever since the beginning. In today’s Washington Post Robert Novak, the reporter who first printed Valerie Plame’s name, jumped on the bandwagon today and tried to repaint the evidence. Conservatives point to the fact that the special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, did not charge anyone with violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982. He points the finger at Richard Armitage and states that he was the first one to tell him, Novak, about Valerie Plame. What he doesn’t point out is that Richard Armitage was not part of Cheney’s plot to discredit Joe Wilson. Richard Armitage, is the MacGuffin in this plot. He leads nowhere. The plot instead begins in the Vice President’s office.

Vice President Cheney and his right-hand man, Scooter Libby, began to think of ways to systematically destroy Joe Wilson’s story and credibility. The plan was not a single attack on the story or the man would get an attack on multiple fronts. First, “we didn’t send him.” This is where Vice President Cheney would flatly deny having anything to do with sending Joe Wilson to Niger. In fact, it was the vice presidents inquiry that prompted the CIA to send Joe Wilson. Why Joe Wilson? Many people have forgotten this point. Joe Wilson had been an ambassador to Niger. He had contacts in the area. He understood the manufacturing and the controls around uranium. At the time, he was nonpartisan and an excellent choice. Secondly, they wanted to discredit the origins of the trip. Create a cloud of confusion around the origins of the trip. For this, they injected Valerie Plame. They would say — she was the one who sent her husband on a “junket”. (Like a trip to Niger was equivalent to a trip to Maui.) Next, they picked specific journalists that they thought would be sympathetic to their case. These are journalists who have written positive stories about the White House and supported the war. Finally, they needed to tell the journalists something really juicy. Something to close the deal. Therefore, they decided to leak specific sections of the national intelligence estimate that supported their claims.

The Scooter Libby trial was about:

  • outing of a CIA operative who happen to be covert
  • leaking classified information for the purposes of destroying critics
  • doing what was necessary in order to support a war
  • the politics of personal attack and destruction

So, when Robert Novak writes that this was no Watergate, he is correct. He is correct if Watergate was about a break in. As we all know, Watergate was about more than a break-in, it was about the cover-up. It was about the lies. Watergate was about arrogance. The Scooter Libby trial was about covering up. The Scooter Libby trial was about lying. The Scooter Libby trial was about doing whatever was necessary to sell the war.

      Finally, the neoconservatives complain that nobody was charged with leaking a CIA operative’s name. They also charge, that Valerie Plame was not a covert agent. Let’s take this last charge first. If she was not a covert agent then why did the CIA turn her name over to the Justice Department for investigation? Secondly, the Intelligence Identities Protection act was not written to capture someone who has leaked a CIA agent’s name once but instead someone who has intentionally leaked (and the operative word is intentionally) a covert agent’s name on multiple occasions. Because the law was written so narrowly it would be very difficult or impossible to convict Karl Rove, Scooter Libby or Dick Cheney therefore the special prosecutor decided not to go down this road.

      4 Responses to ““Trial, no big deal” says the right”

      1. “The Scooter Libby trial was about:

        outing of a CIA operative who happen to be covert
        leaking classified information for the purposes of destroying critics
        doing what was necessary in order to support a war
        the politics of personal attack and destruction ”

        I thought that he was charged with perjury. I hadn’t heard that politics was illegal.

      2. You’re right politics isn’t illegal which is why Rove is sitting at home plotting he next political fight and Libby is sitting at home plotting his next legal fight. Go back and read the transcripts. Rove lied also BUT he and his lawyer came back and said oops I make a mistake. My bad. Libby didn’t. This is why Libby was convicted and Rove was never charged.

        If you must think of this as the Al Capone trial.  The Capone trial wasn’t about taxes it was about a mob guy being put behind bars.  Libby outed a CIA officer.  Same concept.

        Thanks for your comments.

      3. Interesting analogy to Al Capone. Do you believe that Libby is the head of some grand criminal enterprise? I imagine that Cheney or Rove would have to be Capone.

        In that case, one of Capone’s low line soldiers was busted for a lesser charge (gun possession instead of murder). Not only does Capone escape any prosecution but Elliot Ness (Fitzgerald) has decided to shut down the investigation of Capone.

        Seems like a good day for Capone.

      4. Excellent thought TCB. I’m not sure what else Fitzgerald can do unless Libby gives up some information. The information to nail Cheney was discussed in those private conversations between Cheney and Libby. Unless we bug Cheney’s office (Bugging the Vice President’s office tell me that doesn’t raise all kinds of red flags.) we can’t get to Cheney.