Bin Laden
Posted on August 26th, 2007 by ecthompson
New article in Newsweek tries to figure out why we can’t find Bin Laden. I don’t think that you need a whole article. All you need is to look at the Bush administration’s behavior over the last 6 years and it is clear - they needed a boogie man. So the answer to the question is will. Bush learned from his daddy if you do a job very well, America forgets. So what Bush does is show resolve and determination when in fact he knows if he captured Bin Laden there would be no more War on Terror. The American people wouldn’t jump when he said Al Qaeda instead we would say, “Bin there and done that.” (pun intended)
you are a lefty hmm
You moron. Typical bleeding heart. Play the Bush blame game. The guy is in Pakistan. We have a 200 million dollar reward for him in one of the most poorest nations on the planet. I’d say that guy is protected by tribal members as well as Sandy Burglar is protected by the Clintons.
Moron? Maybe. Let me drag my knuckles up from the ground to the keyboard. I have a couple questions for Chris which he won’t answer, I’m guessing.
Why didn’t we encircle Kabul in order to capture Bin Laden BEFORE he escaped to Tora Bora? Why didn’t we drop special forces which were available in front of Bin Laden’s escape routes in Tora Bora? Why did we call off the team of 10,000 soldiers looking for Bin Laden? Why did we disband the Bin Laden unit in the CIA?
$200 million reward to people who don’t have TV or radio? How are they going to know that the reward is offered? Why would they trust that the US would pay the reward they have heard nothing but negative things about the US for the last 20 years? Are they motivated by money? Doubt it.
Thanks for your comments.
John -
I’m a correcty.
Thanks for your comments.