Entries Tagged as ''

Food Crisis Should be Campaign Issue

Rising prices for wheat and rice have created a food crisis in much of the world.

People cannot afford the food they need to eat. Here is an “Economist” story on this subject.

Below is an excerpt from the “Economist” article—

Last year wheat prices rose 77% and rice 16%. These were some of the sharpest rises in food prices ever. But this year the speed of change has accelerated. Since January, rice prices have soared 141%; the price of one variety of wheat shot up 25% in a day. Some 40km outside Abidjan, Mariam Kone, who grows sweet potatoes, okra and maize but feeds her family on imported rice, laments: “Rice is very expensive, but we don’t know why.”

The prices mainly reflect changes in demand—not problems of supply, such as harvest failure. The changes include the gentle upward pressure from people in China and India eating more grain and meat as they grow rich and the sudden, voracious appetites of western biofuels programmes, which convert cereals into fuel. This year the share of the maize (corn) crop going into ethanol in America has risen and the European Union is implementing its own biofuels targets. To make matters worse, more febrile behaviour seems to be influencing markets: export quotas by large grain producers, rumours of panic-buying by grain importers, money from hedge funds looking for new markets.

Here is a “New York Times” story on the topic discussing the global implications of the crisis.

Given that a portion of the crisis has to do with biofuel demand in the United States and that we are all connected in this world, it would be good to hear Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama address this subject as an important campaign topic.

It’s easy to say that we won’t have “cowboy” foreign policy any more. Let’s back up these words with a genuine outreach to people suffering in the world.

History of Pennsylvania Primary

Pennsylvania_state_seal History of Pennsylvania Primary

The Pennsylvania presidential primary has a history that goes back to Progressive Era origins.

Here is a select history of the Pennsylvania primary, and some basic facts about Pennsylvania.

1912 The Republican fight between President William Howard Taft of Ohio and former President Theodore Roosevelt of New York was a test between the more conservative wing of the party, represented by Taft, and Roosevelt’s progressives. Roosevelt won with 60 percent to 40 percent.

Pennsylvania was at the time the second-largest state in the nation and an anchor of Republican support in general elections. But then, however, primaries were not as important as they are today. Taft won the Republican nomination despite a string of losses to Roosevelt. On the Bull Moose ticket, Roosevelt won Pennsylvania in November of 1912.

1916 Henry Ford, of Ford Motor fame, won seven and a half percent of the Republican vote as a write-in candidate. Ford had already won his home state of Michigan and finished strong in Nebraska. Despite this,  his campaign stalled in the end.

1920 The terrible Mitchell Palmer won the Democratic primary. Palmer had been a Pennsylvania Congressman and Attorney General under Woodrow Wilson. As Attorney General, he rounded up American Communists and others left-wing supporters during a World War I “Red Scare.” He did this with a frequent disregard for the basic rights of Americans. Mr. Palmer did not win the 1920 nomination. [Read more →]

Red State Update: Funny as Usual

Red State Update hosts Dunlap and Jackie can’t live through another democratic debate. This is funny as usual. There are a few digs at George Stephanopoulos and Sean Hannity and hair mousse. Clearly worth a listen.

 
icon for podpress  RSU - another dem debate [3:47m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Final Thoughts From PA

  • Quinnipiac University released its latest polling numbers. Unlike many of the folks polling these days in Pennsylvania, Quinnipiac has been in the state for a long time. They know what they are doing. Senator Hillary Clinton is up by six percent. This identical to their poll from two weeks ago. Interestingly, in that poll, one-third of Clinton supporters thought that she wasn’t going to win the nomination. Now, if some of these folks don’t show up for Clinton or they switch allegiance to Senator Barack Obama, the scales might tip in Obama’s favor. Also, I have heard that over 150,000 new voters have signed up.
  • AggieDemocrat on DailyKos are asking folks to vote for Obama. Funny read.
  • Keystone Politics has two opposing articles. One states that Obama will win Pennsylvania. The other post states that Clinton will win by double-digits. Ironically, both articles are written by the same person. I think that Clinton will win, but it will be very close.
  • 2 Political Junkies have some great pictures from a Clinton rally that took place on Monday.
  • Lehigh Valley Political Blog wonders if Clinton doesn’t win the nomination then who would be the next viable woman who could run for President. I’m not sure that there are any female Senators or Congresswomen in position to run for President in 2012.

Obama in Raleigh

Senator Barack Obama comments on the debate in Raleigh. Some things you just have brush off your shoulders. By the way, if this is complaining or whining then it is okay to whine in my book!

 
icon for podpress  Obama in Raleigh [4:10m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Countdown Interviews Senator Clinton

I don’t want to be overly critical but Senator Hillary Clinton seems to be faking her little laugh. Some of her laughing just doesn’t seem appropriate, like when you don’t know what to say and so you laugh to buy time. For instance, when Countdown host Keith Olbermann asked her a question on sexism, she laughed.

More substantially, however, I don’t understand her position on Iran. We going to threaten a nuclear strike if Iran attacks Israel? Or if if any of Iran’s neighbors gets a nuclear weapon? What? If I become a Supreme Being and monkeys fly out of my … What is she talking about?

Despite this, I thought that her Osama Bin Laden answer was pretty good.