http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/2008/07/07/wtc-7-finally-explained/ Thoughtful, intelligent, entertaining, progressive discussion about politics, sports and whatever Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:03:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/2008/07/07/wtc-7-finally-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-58045 ecthompson Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:09:39 +0000 http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/?p=7109#comment-58045 You have a point. Like in the movie Conspiracy, just because you have a new or different idea doesn't mean that you are wrong. You have a point. Like in the movie Conspiracy, just because you have a new or different idea doesn’t mean that you are wrong.

]]> http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/2008/07/07/wtc-7-finally-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-58040 Michael Z Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:48:45 +0000 http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/?p=7109#comment-58040 Errington, I wanted to point out a couple of things in your post here and hope that you respond. First you say "I’m not a conspiracy guy and I don’t see negativity everywhere. " By claiming you are not a conspiracy guy I am assuming that you mean you are not a conspiracy theorist in the derrogatory sense. You reitterate this point with adding that you don't see negativity in everything. I hope you are already seeing where I am going with this. Your statement follows popular thought that conspiracy guys are not to be taken seriously and so you must distance yourself from any speculation that you are one of them. This is exactly how Big Brother would want you to think. Most times the government is lying and producing it's own conspiracy theories as truth, by distancing yourself from the ones who challnge the theories with their own you are helping in promoting the liar's theory. Anyhow, you are right to question the NIST theory on BLDG 7. Trust what you see, the entiere buliding falls at freefall speed in a perfectly symmetrical manner. The largest fire, one consumming the entire building would not cause such a perfect collapse. If so, what are we paying a few companies millions to do what sporattic fire can. Please dedicate a few hours to researching bldg 7. Also investigate why 7 of the 19 hijackers were reported as still living on sept 12. Those two things will be enough to make you a conspiracy guy. You are a capable man, reseach this and share what you learn. Errington,
I wanted to point out a couple of things in your post here and hope that you respond. First you say “I’m not a conspiracy guy and I don’t see negativity everywhere. ” By claiming you are not a conspiracy guy I am assuming that you mean you are not a conspiracy theorist in the derrogatory sense. You reitterate this point with adding that you don’t see negativity in everything. I hope you are already seeing where I am going with this. Your statement follows popular thought that conspiracy guys are not to be taken seriously and so you must distance yourself from any speculation that you are one of them. This is exactly how Big Brother would want you to think. Most times the government is lying and producing it’s own conspiracy theories as truth, by distancing yourself from the ones who challnge the theories with their own you are helping in promoting the liar’s theory. Anyhow, you are right to question the NIST theory on BLDG 7. Trust what you see, the entiere buliding falls at freefall speed in a perfectly symmetrical manner. The largest fire, one consumming the entire building would not cause such a perfect collapse. If so, what are we paying a few companies millions to do what sporattic fire can. Please dedicate a few hours to researching bldg 7. Also investigate why 7 of the 19 hijackers were reported as still living on sept 12. Those two things will be enough to make you a conspiracy guy. You are a capable man, reseach this and share what you learn.

]]>