NSA spying on reporters? (update)

Countdown with Keith Olbermann reveals what liberals have suspected for over 3 years. The Bush administration have been listening in on more than just overseas calls to terrorists. Russell Tice, former NSA employee, reveals that the NSA has collected data on reporters working for all of the major news organizations. This is Enemy of the State stuff.

Watch the video (update below the video):

Update from TP (I would like to thank TP for posting something that was more complete than what I posted):

Last night on MSNBC’s “Countdown with Keith Olbermann,” former analyst for the National Security Agency Russell Tice revealed that the NSA had “monitored all communications” of Americans and specifically targeted journalists:

TICE: The National Security Agency had access to all Americans’ communications — faxes, phone calls, and their computer communications. And it didn’t matter whether you were in Kansas, in the middle of the country, and you never made any foreign communications at all. They monitored all communications. […] But an organization that was collected on were U.S. news organizations and reporters and journalists.

OLBERMANN: To what purpose? I mean, is there a file somewhere full of every e-mail sent by all the reporters at the “New York Times?” Is there a recording somewhere of every conversation I had with my little nephew in upstate New York? Is it like that?

TICE: If it was involved in this specific avenue of collection, it would be everything. Yes. It would be everything.

Tice, a major whistleblower who helped reveal President Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program to the New York Times in 2005, also told Olbermann that the agency sought specifically “to be deceptive” to prevent congressional committees from learning more about the program, calling it “a shell game”:

TICE: The agency would tailor some of their briefings to try to be deceptive for — whether it be, you know, a congressional committee or someone they really didn’t want to know exactly what was going on. So there would be a lot of bells and whistles in a briefing, and quite often, you know, the meat of the briefing was deceptive.

In October, two other whistleblowers told ABC News that the NSA “routinely” listened in on Americans’ phone calls and agents would often share “salacious or tantalizing” intercepted calls with each other. All this despite Bush’s frequent protestations that his illegal wiretaping program was “limited,” that it targeted only “a phone call of an al Qaeda, known al Qaeda suspect,” and that he ensured “that our civil liberties of our citizens are treated with respect.”

To the end, Bush and Cheney defended the program. In his final days in office, Cheney declared that “it always aggravated” him that the Times won a Pulitzer for exposing his administration’s illegal spying program.

————-

Keith will be interviewing Tice again tonight.  Wonder what questions Keith is going to ask?  Why were you fired?  What questions would you ask?

  • stu wilde
    You should check out rawstory.com -- it's a great website and they are all over issues like this.

    I do agree, though, where is the outrage? People have become so apathetic and passive -- mainly, I think, because our politicians are not responsive to normal Americans -- only lobbyists. If torture and warrantless surveillance isn't enough, one must ask the question: what will it take for the populace to make some noise???
  • stu wilde
    You should check out rawstory.com -- it's a great website and they are all over issues like this.

    I do agree, though, where is the outrage? People have become so apathetic and passive -- mainly, I think, because our politicians are not responsive to normal Americans -- only lobbyists. If torture and warrantless surveillance isn't enough, one must ask the question: what will it take for the populace to make some noise???
  • David J. Williams &raq
    [...] revelation on MSNBC that the Bush administration was spying on reporters was pretty arresting television. Check out the video where NSA whistleblower Russell Tice gives [...]
  • ecthompson
    athena - News organizations didn't want to stand up to the bush administration. they are still running scared.

    Jeff - Now is the time to push back. I think that Obama will stop most of if not all of this spying.

    Margaret - You are so right. Qwest was the only telecom to say NO.

    Thanks for your comments.
  • athena - News organizations didn't want to stand up to the bush administration. they are still running scared.

    Jeff - Now is the time to push back. I think that Obama will stop most of if not all of this spying.

    Margaret - You are so right. Qwest was the only telecom to say NO.

    Thanks for your comments.
  • margaret
    It only proves why Bush pushed so hard to get them immunity. Qwest is the only large telecom company who refused to join in the data diving and was punished by not being allowed to bid or to get any government contracts. They should be rewarded for fighting back. They will always be my phone company and my companies. Just for this reason.
  • margaret
    It only proves why Bush pushed so hard to get them immunity. Qwest is the only large telecom company who refused to join in the data diving and was punished by not being allowed to bid or to get any government contracts. They should be rewarded for fighting back. They will always be my phone company and my companies. Just for this reason.
  • JeffLeon
    We don't see this "plastered" everywhere because spying on Americans is the national program and Americans are just stuck with it. Don't like being spied on? Tough. You don't get a choice. That attitude goes clear to the top. While running in the Democratic Party primaries as Senator Obama, President Obama vowed he'd filibuster any bill immunizing telecom companies that helped NSA spy on Americans. Sounded great. But Senator Obama didn't filibuster the telecom-immunity legislation. He voted to pass it.
  • JeffLeon
    We don't see this "plastered" everywhere because spying on Americans is the national program and Americans are just stuck with it. Don't like being spied on? Tough. You don't get a choice. That attitude goes clear to the top. While running in the Democratic Party primaries as Senator Obama, President Obama vowed he'd filibuster any bill immunizing telecom companies that helped NSA spy on Americans. Sounded great. But Senator Obama didn't filibuster the telecom-immunity legislation. He voted to pass it.
  • athena1955
    Yes, where is the outrage for this?!?!
    I did a google search on the story this morning and yours is the only site that came up with anything current. Why are we not seeing this plastered across the front pages of the newspapers? It isn't like the media has to worry anymore about losing access to government resources, is it?
  • athena1955
    Yes, where is the outrage for this?!?!
    I did a google search on the story this morning and yours is the only site that came up with anything current. Why are we not seeing this plastered across the front pages of the newspapers? It isn't like the media has to worry anymore about losing access to government resources, is it?
blog comments powered by Disqus