Entries Tagged as ''

Egypt update

I am not an expert on Egypt, nor do I think that in the next couple of days reading a few articles is going to make me an expert. So I’ll try and post some thoughtful articles from Juan Cole, a university professor and an expert on Middle East politics. (I had him on my radio show. He was great!)

From Informed Comment:

Protesters in downtown Cairo on Monday morning were calling for a general strike. On Tuesday, they said they will launch a ‘million-person march,’ clearly with the aim of toppling the Mubarak government.

On Sunday, a multi-party coalition of oppositionists had formed a 10-man committee to head their movement. The leader of the committee, in turn, is Mohamed Elbaradei, the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Elbaradei came down to Tahrir Square in the city center and addressed the thousands assembled there, to rapturous applause.

He repeatedly demanded Hosni Mubarak’s resignation. .

The Muslim Brotherhood is among the parties in the coalition backing Elbaradei. Their leadership may feel that having a secular person as the face of the movement will cut down on the fears of budding theocracy and threats of Western intervention.

Also among the proposed steering committee is long-time Mubarak opponent Ayman Nour. He had run against Mubarak in 2005, and was promptly jailed when the official statistics showed he had only garnered about 8 percent of the vote. Nour, head of the Tomorrow (al-Ghad) Party, had earlier proposed that the major opposition parties form an alternative parliament, which could then oversee the transition to full democracy. Elbaradei now seems to be endorsing this idea.

Meanwhile, further statements from Hosni Mubarak and his regime give a sense of his current strategy. He implicitly blamed the Muslim Brotherhood for the sabotage and arson that has been committed against government institutions, including police stations. He contrasted the hooliganism of the Brotherhood with the peaceful aspirations of most Egyptians, and pledged to work for economic and social reform (while giving the pledge no content). Mubarak is attempting to split the movement against him by sowing seeds of doubt among its constituents. These include Coptic Christians, educated middle and upper middle class Muslims, and non-ideological youth, as well as the Muslim Brotherhood. By suggesting that the MB is taking advantage of the protests to conduct a campaign of sabotage behind the scenes, with the goal of establishing a theocratic dictatorship, Mubarak hopes to terrify the other groups into breaking with the Muslim fundamentalists. Since middle class movements such as Kefaya (Enough!) are small and not very well organized, Mubarak may believe that he can easily later crush them if he can detach them from the more formidable Brotherhood.

It is a desperate ploy and unlikely to work. Mainstream Muslim Egyptians and Copts do have some fear of the Muslim Brotherhood as a sectarian and fundamentalist tendency, but their dislike of the Mubarak government for the moment seems to overcome their anxieties about a theocracy.

The other part of the strategy of Mubarak and his VP Omar Suleiman may be to gradually take back control via the army, and then slowly squeeze the crowds out of public spaces. If that is their plan, the million-person march on Tuesday could turn sanguinary.

But as one Egyptian woman said, “If they fire on the Egyptian people, Mubarak is finished . . . And if they don’t fire on the Egyptian people, Mubarak is finished.”

Legal Craziness

All of the ups and downs of the Healthcare Affordability Act make it somewhat dizzying. Here’s the latest from DK:

Reagan appointee Roger Vinson today struck down what appears to be most of the Affordable Care Act, writing:

“Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire Act must be declared void.”

In writing the law, Dems did not include a severability clause, “meant to protect the bulk of a law in the event that a small portion of it is determined to be unconstitutional. That small portion must go, or be changed, but pretty much everything else is allowed to stand.” Thus, presumably, by finding the mandate unconstitutional, Vinson decided to rule against the bulk of the law.

This was the case brought by 26 states, arguing that Congress exceeded its authority in the mandate. Vinson joins a George W. Bush appointee, Henry Hudson in finding the mandate unconstitutional. Hudson’s ruling has been roundly criticized.

At least 14 other judges have dismissed challenges to the Affordable Care Act. As Ian Millhiser writes, it’s not likely Hudson’s and Vinson’s rulings would stand a Supreme Court challenge. Millhiser also gives a quick summary of previous lower court decisions against sweeping federal actions that bit the dust.

  • Minimum Wage: In United States v. Darby, the Supreme Court upheld a federal minimum wage and overruled  a prior decision striking down federal child labor laws. This decision reversed a district judge’s opinion declaring the minimum wage unconstitutional.
  • Social Security: In Helvering v. Davis, the Supreme Court reversed a court of appeals decision declaring Social Security unconstitutional.
  • Whites-Only Lunch Counters: In Katzenbach v. McClung, the Supreme Court upheld the federal ban on whites-only lunch counters — reversing a district court’s decision striking down this law.
  • Voting Rights Act: In Katzenbach v. Morgan, the Supreme Court reversed a district court decision striking down a portion of the Voting Rights Act (the Court since stepped back from the reasoning applied in Morgan, but the Voting Rights Act remains good law).

The opinion is available here.

Update: Brian Beutler notes that voiding the entire law over the lack of a severability clause is extreme, and unnecessary–even without the clause, single provisions of laws can be struck down. And have been, including recently by Judge John Roberts.

Supporting freedom

The Right is very fond of talking about freedom and liberty. The people of Egypt have lived under a dictatorship for years and it now appears they have asked for freedom. They are protesting in the streets to overthrow their own government. This hearkens to the “redress of grievances” part that our founding fathers stated in the first amendment and that the Right continues to talk about. Now that the people of Egypt have spoken, why are the conservatives not supporting them?

From TP:

As ThinkProgress reported earlier today, a number of high-profile right-wing figures have risen to the defense of the embattled Hosni Mubarak government in Egypt. Yet as thousands of Egyptians continue to fight for their freedom, the eyes of the international community are falling squarely on the Obama administration.

Today, the Egypt Working Group — “A bipartisan group of former U.S. officials and foreign policy scholars” that includes CAP’s Brian Katulis — released a statement calling on President Obama to suspend military and economic aid to Egypt until the government endorses free and fair elections and ends its crackdown on civil liberties and civil rights:

Only free and fair elections provide the prospect for a peaceful transfer of power to a government recognized as legitimate by the Egyptian people. We urge the Obama administration to pursue these fundamental objectives in the coming days and press the Egyptian government to:

- call for free and fair elections for president and for parliament to be held as soon as possible;
- amend the Egyptian Constitution to allow opposition candidates to register to run for the presidency;
- immediately lift the state of emergency, release political prisoners, and allow for freedom of media and assembly;
- allow domestic election monitors to operate throughout the country, without fear of arrest or violence;
- immediately invite international monitors to enter the country and monitor the process leading to elections, reporting on the government’s compliance with these measures to the international community; and
- publicly declare that Hosni Mubarak will agree not to run for re-election.

We further recommend that the Obama administration suspend all economic and military assistance to Egypt until the government accepts and implements these measures.

The position of the Obama administration has been unclear. While administration officials have condemned abuses of civil liberties, they’ve also fallen short of endorsing Mubarak’s ouster or ending support for the regime, with Vice President Joe Biden even going as far as to say that Mubarak isn’t a dictator.

There’s right and there’s wrong; this is wrong

Kelley Williams-Bolar

Just a couple of items:

  • I know that the progressive thing to do is to talk about the riots in Egypt. I’m sorry, I’m not an expert on Egyptian politics, but my friend Brian Katulis at the Center for American Progress is an expert. He’s laying down his insight.
  • It is no surprise to me that any objective panel would find that Wall Street may have violated federal securities law. The whole mortgage-backed security debacle was dependent upon two critical deceptions – first, someone had to be set up with a loan that was bigger than they needed. This was done in a variety of ways, but the most commonly used was the adjustable-rate mortgage. So, the home owner would sign up for an adjustable-rate mortgage and would either refinance the house or sell it within a couple of years in order to avoid paying the high mortgage payments. Secondly, the banks needed to securitize these mortgages and then sell them to pensions and municipalities who could only invest in very safe AAA rated bonds. As we now know, many these bonds weren’t even BBB in quality. The Ponzi scheme depended upon this type of deception. Thankfully, somebody’s paying attention.
  • Gross Domestic Product grew at a higher than expected rate. I was ready for some good news and I guess this is it. :-)
  • Finally, I wanted to take just a minute to talk about Kelley Williams-Bolar. Ms. Bolar is a 40-year-old woman who was sentenced to 10 days in jail after it was discovered that she used a fraudulent address in order to get her kids into a better school system. Now, I think it is admirable to try to get your kids into a better school system. As a matter fact, I think it is a parent’s duty. I know that this is being done hundreds of thousands of times across the country, yet I don’t know of anybody else going to jail for it. With the overcrowding of jails I’m not sure that this is a jailable offense. But, being thrown in jail for 10 days is not the most egregious aspect of this case, in my opinion. For some reason this is a felony. This mother of two now has a felony on her record. She is trying to become a teacher’s aide, has been taking some sort of classes. She may not be able to get a teacher’s license because of this felony conviction. This simply isn’t right.

MLK Day Celebration

I was honored to speak at the MLK Day celebration here in Asheville. The day was cold but the hearts were warm. It was great to see so many kids (even kids from the Christ School showed up). I really appreciate the invite.

From ACT:

Hundreds of community members took inspiration from Martin Luther King Jr. on Monday by asking themselves: What are we doing for others?

In light of the recent shooting in Arizona, local trauma surgeon and Peace March and Rally guest speaker Errington Thompson used the opportunity as a rallying cry to improve the nation’s mental health services. He called for more employees and more funds as well as better diagnosis and early intervention.

In September 1958, a 42-year-old woman suffering from paranoid schizophrenia stabbed King at a Harlem book signing. Afterward, King urged the community “to be more concerned about mental health and social problems,” Thompson said.

“He (King) was talking about a problem that we have been working on for over 50 years and still haven’t solved,” Thompson said at the rally on Roger McGuire Green by City Hall.

It is kind of weird that Susan Fisher was not mentioned. I thought she did an excellent job. Maybe the Asheville Citizen Times has a policy of mentioning trauma surgeons and not state representatives.

A few last comments on the SOTU

I just finished watching the State of the Union.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Sorry. I’m a political junkie and I admit it, but I really don’t like the State of the Union address. I think that the State of the Union is an excellent opportunity for the president to paint a picture of something that he knows he will never achieve. I want reality. If I want fantasy, I’ll read a book or watch Star Wars for the 23rd time. I just don’t see how you cap spending and invest in infrastructure, new technology and green energy. The whole thing leaves me kind of depressed.

The only part of the whole speech that I really enjoyed was that the seating arrangements prevented the high school pep rally type atmosphere. Also, I think the president speech did not lend itself to the wild applause that we’ve seen over the past 10 or 15 years. That I liked.

Now, what can the president truly deliver?

The Massive Budget Deficit In Texas

Due in large part to Republican mismanagement of state finances, and due to the failure of many ordinary Texans to meet the everyday obligations of citizenship, the State of Texas faces a massive budget deficit.

(Above—Not long after the Arizona shooting rampage, the Austin State Hospital, which offers mental health assistance, faces drastic Texas state budget cuts. Photo by Larry D. Moore.)

State Comptroller Susan Combs says the deficit could possible be as high as $27 billion for the 2012-2013 biennium.

The Texas Legislature, now in session, will have to approve a budget for 2012 and 2013.

There are many reasons for this budget shortfall. Some of them have nothing to do with anything in the control of Texas. The national recession has hit states hard  across the nation.

However, property tax cuts Texas could not afford and a Republican ideology of small government and low taxes no matter what, has also put Texas in this tough spot.

Will states rights and reflexive bashing of Washington help your kid compete with kids from India and China? Will it help you when you are sick and need help? Will Governor Perry declaring divisive Voter ID bills for non-existent voter fraud and sanctuary city legislation an “emergency” help anybody?

People in Texas need to make the call that they are going to demand a focus on things that matter, and that they will not allow themselves to be distracted by sideshows.

We need to be clear. Republicans have been in firm control of Texas for many years now. Texas has had a Republican Governor since 1995. Republicans have long been in control of both Houses of the Texas Legislature.

Republicans would have you believe that only states run by Democrats face these types of deficit problems.

However, because we are not powerless as free citizens, this problem is also on average Texans who have enjoyed low taxes even as our state has failed on so many measures of education and public health. [Read more →]

NFL: weekend wrap-up and Jay Cutler

Yes, I know that the State of the Union address begins in one hour. I don’t know, something about the State of the Union address has turned me off for more than a decade. The spectacle of I stand up and you sit down and look stonefaced kind of makes my stomach turn. So, I’m going to be pouring over the text of his speech for the next hour and hopefully I’ll have something intelligent to say in the morning. Hopefully.

Green Bay Packers versus Chicago Bears – Let me lay out the scenario for you. The Chicago Bears have a good defense. Unfortunately, they’re nothing like the 1985 Bear defense. So, they are probably not going to win the game for you but they’re not going to lose the game for you either. They do create turnovers. I’ve never been a believer in the Bear Offense. They were good, not great. On the other side of the ball, I thought the Packers were pretty well-balanced with a very good defense and a great offense. I thought that Aaron Rodgers was playing in the zone. His game against the Atlanta Falcons will be watched for years to come. It might not have been perfect but he was really, really close. So, if this assessment was correct, it was critically important for the Chicago Bears to come out red hot. They needed to seize the initiative. They needed to make the Green Bay Packers play from behind. They needed the special teams and Devin Hester to do something special. Chicago’s first five drives ended in punts. No drivers were more than six plays. The sixth drive ended in an interception (a terribly thrown ball by Cutler). This is simply a disaster, a real disaster for the Chicago Bears. The only thing that can be said about the first half that was actually good for the Chicago Bears was that the defense did not get totally overrun. The defense settled down and were able to get stops by the early part of the second quarter. Unfortunately, the score was already 14-0. The game was over by halftime. The Green Bay Packers were clearly the better team.

Now, there’s a lot of controversy and yackity-yak over Jay Cutler and his early departure from the game. It really doesn’t matter if I think that Jay Cutler (in the words of Deion Sanders) tapped out. He may have. The question is whether his teammates believe in him and his abilities. The question is whether his teammates believe that he is going to fight for them as hard as they are fighting for him… That’s the question. It appears that his teammates have rallied around him. Jay Cutler’s problem is one of perception. He doesn’t show any the emotion and the rah-rah leadership that many want to see from a top-tier quarterback. As a matter fact, most of the time he seems to have this confused look on his face. Jay Cutler got completely beaten up earlier this year. The first four games were a nightmare. He seemed to be sacked or hit on nearly every play. Yet, somehow, he played through that misery. What I do know is that Jay Cutler’s performance on Sunday was abysmal. Between Todd Collins and Jay Cutler, they were 6/18 for 80 yards, no touchdowns and one interception. I can do that, promise. (BTW, he has some sort of partially torn ACL.)

New York Jets versus Pittsburgh Steelers – It was only yesterday I was able to watch the whole game without interruption. What the hell? The Pittsburgh Steelers are walking around and pounding their chests like they did something. What? They did not win that game; they just didn’t lose it. The New York Jets fumbled away an excellent opportunity to go to the Super Bowl. This game should eat away at every Jet player for the next several weeks or months, if not years.

The game opened with Rex Ryan trying to be cute and deferring when he won the coin toss. Deferring? That’s a Bill Belichick maneuver. That’s crap. Rex Ryan had to know that his offense was going to have some tough sledding against the outstanding Pittsburgh Steelers defense. He needed to make a decision, a real decision. This is football. Bill Belichick, in my opinion, is an arrogant knucklehead. Why would anyone want to follow in his footsteps? (I would like to be as successful as he is but not follow in his footsteps.) Rex Ryan has a real defense. He needed to go to his defense and tell them that he believes they are best defense in the league and therefore, if he were to win the toss, he’d elect kickoff. Instead, he deferred. His defense got pounded. It was an embarrassing, humiliating and demoralizing 15-play, 9-minute drive which ended in a touchdown. Game over. The New York Jets, on their critically important first possession, moved the ball a whopping 19 yards (+10 yards they received in penalties). Yes, there were more touchdowns, interceptions, field goals, goal line stands and valiant efforts but for all practical purposes, the Pittsburgh Steelers said everything they needed to say on their opening drive. The New York Jets went into halftime 21 points down. That’s the game. The Steelers simply outplayed and outcoached the New York Jets in the first half.

Don’t get me wrong. The Jets did make some adjustments at halftime. The Jets really shut down the Pittsburgh Steelers in the second half. Mark Sanchez, who appeared comatose in the first half, began to play like a first-round draft choice, but it was too little, too late. The Jets needed his leadership, that grit, earlier, still in the first half. Oh, by the way, if you’re trying to overcome a major deficit in the second half you cannot go on an 8-minute drive and stall on the one-yard line. That simply cannot happen if you want to go to the Super Bowl. Somehow, in some way, the Jets needed to get the ball in the end zone on that drive and it didn’t happen.

If you like defensive struggles this was a good weekend of football.

Justice for the Scott Sisters?

I’m not a lawyer, nor am I a judge, but I could smell something rotten from over a mile away. Several weeks ago, I read the story of Jamie and Gladys Scott. Bob Herbert highlighted the sisters in one of his columns. To me, this story screamed of a miscarriage of justice. Briefly, here’s their story:

On December 24, 1993, Scott County Sheriff’s Department in Mississippi arrested the sisters for an armed robbery they vehemently deny participation in. In 1994 they were convicted after being implicated in the crime by three young black men who confessed to the robbery in exchange of a plea bargain that gave them 10 months. The sisters were not offered a plea and went to trial.

Many bloggers have focused on the fact that this armed robbery raked in a whopping $11. I like to focus on the fact that nobody died. I would like to focus on the fact that each of the Scott sisters had a clean record. So, what should be the maximum sentence for armed robbers who are first-time offenders? In Mississippi, the answer is two life sentences. The three guys who admitted to this crime received only 10 months. They took the plea bargain. So what happened?

Right now, I’m going to speculate. I’m going to speculate that the prosecutor saw these two black women as agitators. He saw them as two people who were going against the system. His system. He saw them as two black women who did not show the proper respect to authority. He took it as a personal affront that they had the nerve to contradict him and state, multiple times, that they were innocent. Therefore, the prosecutor acted as any dictator might, with rage, and he overreacted. He threw the book at the Scott sisters. Two life sentences. (Why this is even possible in Mississippi isn’t clear to me. What’s the sentence for jaywalking, a decade of hard labor behind bars?)

Time passed. All of their appeals were denied. The Supreme Court wouldn’t even hear their case. One of the robbers signed an affidavit that stated the Scott sisters had nothing to do with the armed robbery. The Mississippi justice system simply yawned. They didn’t care. Then, one of the Scott sisters developed renal failure while in prison. (Probably from poorly controlled diabetes and hypertension. I’m just guessing, but it is an educated guess. One would figure that as an inmate you could get basic medical care. I guess not.) Jamie is dying. She needs a renal transplant. Her sister Gladys is a match. Somehow, the NAACP got involved. Governor Haley Barbour was petitioned to pardon the women.

Now, here’s where Lady Justice is turned on her head. Haley Barbour, a governor who gives out few pardons, decided to pardon the Scott sisters, although he did not hand out an unconditional pardon. They could be released only if Gladys donated a kidney to Jamie. What? Why is that a condition for their release? This is crazy. Isn’t that coercion? (Let me digress for just a half a second. Organ donation is supposed to be a completely and totally generous act. Transplant physicians do not want their patients pressuring family members to give organs.  It is illegal and violates transplant ethics. This is an extremely slippery slope.) In my opinion, Haley Barbour is wrong in so many different ways. Either commute or pardon the sentences or leave the sisters in jail. To pardon them with this stipulation is simply wrong. It is wrong for the transplant community. It is wrong for Gladys. It is wrong for Mississippi. This can’t be justice. It just doesn’t smell right. What are your thoughts?

Rachel Maddow wins the discussion on Bill Maher

I love me some Rachel Maddow. She is thoughtful, smart, compassionate and will stand up to make her point, literally.

From Mediate:

Political shoutfests are certainly no stranger to TV, and Real Time, despite being a generally friendly atmosphere, has hosted very heated debates over the years. But last night, a debate over Reaganomics between Rachel Maddow and the Wall Street Journal’s Steve Moore which ended with Maddow uncharacteristically standing up to shout over her adversary had a bit of a twist: Reagan’s Budget Director, David Stockman, sat silently beside Maddow and watched.

Bill Maher opened the talk with discussion on how inflating the deficit through budget cuts was, according to him, a destructive Republican tendency that had overflowed from the Reagan administration to today. Moore leapt to Reagan’s defense, calling it the “greatest policy of the last 30 years” and noting the economic boom that came from lowering tax rates. Maddow, seated beside Moore, took some political offense, and Maher kept back and watched the two’s chat evolve into a venerable political shouting match. “What happened to the deficit?” Maddow demanding to know, as Moore replied only “What happened to the economy?” This went on for some time until both sides answered the others question (and therefore negated both of their points, returning them to indoor voices).

The indoor voices didn’t last, of course, as Maddow continued to make the point that income inequality peaked during the Reagan years, and, in order to complete her point over Moore’s voice, stood up and wagged her fingers angrily and concluded with a flourish by stating that, if you were anything but the richest of the rich in America, “Reagan sucked.” It was a Rachel Maddow we rarely get to see on our show– what one would imagine Maddow to be like if Crossfire still existed.

At this point, a laughing Maher leapt back into action to activate the third guest silently eyeing the debate– David Stockman, Reagan’s budget director and the man whose work the other two guests were shouting about. Maher noted the famous scene in Annie Hall where a pseudo-intellectual attempts to prattle on about the work of one Marshall McLuhan, who enters the scene only to say, “you know nothing of my work.” Similarly, Stockman enters the fray to clarify that, while he supported the tax cuts and agreed that they improved the economy, the “war on spending” that both sides were attempting to fight was “like the proverbial French army rifle: never been fired, and dropped only once.”

Speaking of firing, once everyone simmered down on the economics front Maher brought it back to things he disliked about Reagan, namely the fact that he did not pass stricter gun control laws after his assassination attempt. Of the three panelists, Stockman was shockingly the most anti-gun, arguing that they have “no place in 21st century civilization” and that “they should be scorned; they should be banned.”

Bigotry 101 (update)

When I first heard the Alabama governor proclaim that only Christians were his “brothers and sisters,” I figured that he misspoke. Why would you want to alienate all non-Christians? This would seem to be an easy fix. Oops, I got carried away or I didn’t follow my written text and I misspoke. Everyone is my brother and sister because like Jesus, I love my fellow man and woman. But, no. He didn’t say any such thing. His “clarification,” three days later, just re-enforced his statement. As a matter of fact, it did more. He really isn’t embracing all Christians, either… just Baptists.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

From TPM:

Speaking on Martin Luther King Jr. Day in the very church where Dr. King once pastored, new Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley gave a speech in which he said that those who have not accepted Jesus Christ as their savior are not his “brothers.”

Bentley spoke at the Dexter Avenue King Memorial Baptist Church in Montgomery just minutes after taking the oath of office on Monday. The new governor, who has been a deacon at First Baptist Church in Tuscaloosa, first said that though he ran as a Republican, once he took office he “became the governor of all the people.”

“I am color blind,” Bentley said, according to The Birmingham News.

But Bentley then said that only those who are Christians and “saved” like he is are his brothers and sisters.

“There may be some people here today who do not have living within them the Holy Spirit,” Bentley said. ”But if you have been adopted in God’s family like I have, and like you have if you’re a Christian and if you’re saved, and the Holy Spirit lives within you just like the Holy Spirit lives within me, then you know what that makes? It makes you and me brothers. And it makes you and me brother and sister.”

”Now I will have to say that, if we don’t have the same daddy, we’re not brothers and sisters,” he said. “So anybody here today who has not accepted Jesus Christ as their savior, I’m telling you, you’re not my brother and you’re not my sister, and I want to be your brother.” (more…)

Don’t you think that this guy was a little over the top? What are your thoughts?

Update: KJV – Matthew 9:10-13 And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with him and his disciples. And when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your master with publicans and sinners? But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick. But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

I just wonder if the Alabama governor has read this portion of the Bible.

Domestic Terrorism – Getting a handle on our own

Did you hear about the bomb that was found in Spokane? This was serious.

From TPM:

A bomb found along the route of a Martin Luther King Day parade in Spokane, Wash., on Monday was a sophisticated device with the potential to devastate, an official on the case tells the AP.

“They haven’t seen anything like this in this country,” the official said. “This was the worst device, and most intentional device, I’ve ever seen.”

The official also said the device was rigged to a remote detonator.

Officially, the FBI has not released many details about the bomb, other than that it was viable and could have caused multiple casualties.

An FBI official yesterday told TPM the bomb was an act of “domestic terrorism.”

It was found Monday morning in a parking lot along the parade route, just half an hour before the parade was to begin. Three city workers who found the backpack it was stuffed in called the police, who sealed off several blocks and rerouted the parade. The FBI dismantled the bomb and is handling the investigation. (more…)

This isn’t the first bomb threat or terrorist attempt in the last couple of years. There is a trend. There is an uptick in this kind of terrorism. All of these acts are targeting Liberals or the Government. This a growing problem.

From C&L:

July 2008: A gunman named Jim David Adkisson, agitated at how “liberals” are “destroying America,” walks into a Unitarian Church and opens fire, killing two churchgoers and wounding four others.

October 2008: Two neo-Nazis are arrested in Tennessee in a plot to murder dozens of African-Americans, culminating in the assassination of President Obama.

December 2008: A pair of “Patriot” movement radicals — the father-son team of Bruce and Joshua Turnidge, who wanted “to attack the political infrastructure” — threaten a bank in Woodburn, Oregon, with a bomb in the hopes of extorting money that would end their financial difficulties, for which they blamed the government. Instead, the bomb goes off and kills two police officers. The men eventually are convicted and sentenced to death for the crime.

December 2008: In Belfast, Maine, police discover the makings of a nuclear “dirty bomb” in the basement of a white supremacist shot dead by his wife. The man, who was independently wealthy, reportedly was agitated about the election of President Obama and was crafting a plan to set off the bomb.

January 2009: A white supremacist named Keith Luke embarks on a killing rampage in Brockton, Mass., raping and wounding a black woman and killing her sister, then killing a homeless man before being captured by police as he is en route to a Jewish community center.

February 2009: A Marine named Kody Brittingham is arrested and charged with plotting to assassinate President Obama. Brittingham also collected white-supremacist material.

April 2009: A white supremacist named Richard Poplawski opens fire on three Pittsburgh police officers who come to his house on a domestic-violence call and kills all three, because he believed President Obama intended to take away the guns of white citizens like himself. Poplawski is currently awaiting trial.

April 2009: Another gunman in Okaloosa County, Florida, similarly fearful of Obama’s purported gun-grabbing plans, kills two deputies when they come to arrest him in a domestic-violence matter, then is killed himself in a shootout with police.

May 2009: A “sovereign citizen” named Scott Roeder walks into a church in Wichita, Kansas, and assassinates abortion provider Dr. George Tiller.

June 2009: A Holocaust denier and right-wing tax protester named James Von Brunn opens fire at the Holocaust Museum, killing a security guard.

February 2010: An angry tax protester named Joseph Ray Stack flies an airplane into the building housing IRS offices in Austin, Texas. (Media are reluctant to label this one “domestic terrorism” too.)

March 2010: Seven militiamen from the Hutaree Militia in Michigan and Ohio are arrested and charged with plotting to assassinate local police officers with the intent of sparking a new civil war.

March 2010: An anti-government extremist named John Patrick Bedell walks into the Pentagon and opens fire, wounding two officers before he is himself shot dead.

May 2010: A “sovereign citizen” from Georgia is arrested in Tennessee and charged with plotting the violent takeover of a local county courthouse.

May 2010: A still-unidentified white man walks into a Jacksonville, Fla., mosque and sets it afire, simultaneously setting off a pipe bomb.

May 2010: Two “sovereign citizens” named Jerry and Joe Kane gun down two police officers who pull them over for a traffic violation, and then wound two more officers in a shootout in which both of them are eventually killed.

July 2010: An agitated right-winger and convict named Byron Williams loads up on weapons and drives to the Bay Area intent on attacking the offices of the Tides Foundation and the ACLU, but is intercepted by state patrolmen and engages them in a shootout and armed standoff in which two officers and Williams are wounded.

September 2010: A Concord, N.C., man is arrested and charged with plotting to blow up a North Carolina abortion clinic. The man, 26-year–old Justin Carl Moose, referred to himself as the “Christian counterpart to (Osama) bin Laden” in a taped undercover meeting with a federal informant.

January 2011: A 22-year-old gunman named Jared Lee Loughner with a long grudge against Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and a paranoid hatred of the government walks into a public Giffords event and shoots her in the head, then keeps firing, killing six people and wounding 14 more. Gifford miraculously survives.

January 2011: A backpack bomb with the potential of killing or injuring dozens of people is found along the route of a Martin Luther King Day “unity march” in downtown Spokane.

Tea Party Future–Is This What You Want?

What does the so-called Tea Party stand for? What is the Tea Party agenda?

A recent blog post by Tea Party follower David Jennings at his Houston and Texas political blog Big Jolly Politics gives a clear sense of the ideologically extreme Tea Party agenda.

Mr. Jennings regularly attends and offers up observations from meetings of Tea Party cells. His most recent report from the Clear Lake Tea Party here in Houston gives a clear sense of a radical, unworkable, and often un-American Tea Party vision for our nation.

Reporting on a talk given the Clear Lake Tea Party member named Robert Gonzales, who Mr. Jennings describes as the “founder” of this local Tea Party cell, Mr. Jennings offers up a list Tea Party priorities for the days ahead.

Here are some of these Tea Party priorities as reported by Mr. Jennings—

“Reject Obamacare.”

Repeal of Healthcare Reform will allow insurance companies  to once again toss people off coverage because they get sick, and will allow insurance companies to once again impose lifetime caps on policies. Is that what we want to go back to in our nation? Read about Healthcare Reform for yourself. It does a lot of good. For the extreme right in this nation, the issue is not the good points or the weak points of Healthcare Reform. Instead, it is all about political ideology and scoring political points no matter the merits of the program. You see the same with the reflexive far-right rejection to the idea of global warming.  No facts of any kind matter in the discussion. Ideology and anger are all that counts.

” Reinstate Judeo-Christian Values. ….Prayer back in schools and hanging the Ten Commandments in public buildings…”

People can pray anytime they want.  People can live true each and every day to the religious values they hold. Are these values so weak that they must be posted in every building? This would be little different from how an insecure and fearful totalitarian state posts propaganda in every classroom and in every possible location. Where is the confidence in ideas that Christians hold as eternal?  Does Christianity need government support? Can’t people find the truth for themselves rather than forcing one idea of truth on an ever-more diverse nation? What will stop a future government from posting anti-Christian messages in public buildings at some point?

* ” English as the official language….”

It sure would be intrusive of government to tell people how they should speak.  Will the declaration of an official language come with a language police? Will private business places that advertise to Spanish speaking customers or Chinese speaking customers be subject to fines or some type of official sanction?  Will people inform on others who are speaking the wrong language? We could set up a whole new language enforcement bureaucracy. [Read more →]

Opinions Versus Facts

I think that everyone in America would agree that we are all entitled to our own opinions. As a matter fact, I don’t think it’s a prerequisite to have your own opinions. If you want to you can borrow someone else’s. Yet, it is often the case, especially on talk radio, that someone will start flapping their lips and will lay out a set of “facts” which flow into their opinion. The problem is that their “facts” are sometimes not facts at all. Sometimes they are indeed lies. Let’s look at what Representative Steve King (R-IA) stated on G Gordon Liddy’s talk show (the fact that Liddy did not even attempt to correct him is a different conversation and says a lot about Liddy’s character).

From TP:

First of all [the Affordable Care Act] is unconstitutional. We can go through all of that component, Gordon, but, in the end, this trade off of giving up our personal decisions on what health insurance policy we choose to buy, what health insurance policy will be delivered to us because of market demands, and making decisions on doctors and tests and second opinions, as a whole list of things that are taken away from us under Obamacare. All of that, for what? So that we have a federal mandate that children must stay on our insurance until age 26? I want mine to grow up, as a matter of fact.

And then, going on down the line, preexisting conditions, the states can address that constitutionally far better than the federal government, and that’s how it should be addressed.

I think that there is a legitimate argument to be made about whether or not the Affordability Care Act is constitutional. It is when you start making up what’s in the act that I have a problem. There is no mandate that children must be on anyone’s insurance until age 26. This is a complete misreading of the bill. Instead, parents have the ability to keep kids on their insurance, if they want to, until age 26.

The Bill specifically states that you have the power to choose your own doctor and your own hospital. To state otherwise is a lie.

NBC – Comcast merger leaves us out in the cold, again

It seems to me that every merger should be looked at through the lens of the middle class. Is this merger good for the middle class? I just don’t think that the answer is yes. I think that this limits choices and will lead to increased consolidation and increased prices.

From HuffPo:

Today, the Federal Communications Commissionblessed the merger of Comcast, the nation’s largest cable and residential Internet provider, with NBC-Universal. The Justice Department immediately followed suit, removing the last obstacle to the unprecedented consolidation of media and Internet power in the hands of one company. (FCC press release here)

You should be afraid and mad as hell.

The new Comcast will control an obscene number of media outlets, including the NBC broadcast network, numerous cable channels, two dozen local NBC and Telemundo stations, movie studios, online video portals, and the physical network that distributes that media content to millions of Americans through Internet and cable connections.

Comcast CEO Brian Roberts called it “a proud and exciting day for Comcast,” and showered Obama’s FCC and DoJ with praise. (more…)

The true progressive movement

Many people are standing around dazed and bewildered. With Martin Luther King’s birthday coming on the heels of the massacre in Tucson, many people are wondering where this country is heading. Let me suggest that we “take the bull by the horns.” That we start wondering where the country is headed and take the country in the direction that we wanted to go. Let’s start with some inspiration. Maya Angelou.

Now let’s move onto something a little bit more concrete. From HuffPo:

In 1955, except for a recent Supreme Court decision on school segregation widely held to be unenforceable, there was no support from the government to end the racial order in the South. The Democratic Party was fatally dependent on the votes of Southern racists. The Republican Party of Lincoln was failing to lead even on something as rudimentary as a federal anti-lynching law.

Yet within a decade, the legal foundations of what Pulitzer Prize winning author Douglas Blackmon called “slavery by another name” had crumbled. Half a century later, public attitudes were continuing to evolve, glacially to be sure, but in the direction of Dr. King’s arc of justice. Far sooner than he might have expected, our country elected an African American president.

I mention all this not just because this is the day to remember Dr. King, but because we progressives have been depressing the hell out of each other lately and wringing our hands about President Obama’s missed opportunities.

It is all too easy to make a list of why all political possible avenues to a more progressive society are blocked. If you want to wallow in it, here is the list:

  • Wall Street capture of both parties.
  • An alliance between billionaires and disaffected common people.
  • The Citizens United case ushering in a new era of money overwhelming citizenship.
  • A grievously weakened labor movement.
  • President Obama spending his prestige seeking a nonexistent middle ground.
  • A right wing media machine/echo chamber with no counterpart on the liberal left.
  • An almost certain Republican takeover of both houses of Congress in 2012.
  • A prolonged era of deep recession that, weirdly, energizes the right rather than the left.
  • A new dark age of theocracy and denial of verifiable scientific truth
  • A national psychosis embracing guns as a basic civic right

I look at this list and think of ways that we can come together to make our country better. What do you think about when you read this list?

A Woman with Mental Health Problems crossed paths with MLK

This is not on the radar and not talked about in Washington.

From CNN:

In the wake of the Arizona shooting, the co-founders of the Congressional Mental Health Caucus want to make sure those who suffer from mental illnesses are able to receive the help they want or need.

Democratic Rep. Grace Napolitano of California and Republican Pennsylvania Rep. Tim Murphy, who founded the caucus in 2003, both acknowledged Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” that more education and action is needed to improve the response to mental illness in the United States.

Did you know that Martin Luther King was stabbed in 1958? He was stabbed by a woman who was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia.

From Stanford’s great MLK site:

On 20 September 1958, Izola Ware Curry, a forty-two year old mentally disturbed woman, stabbed Martin Luther King, Jr. while he signed copies of his book Stride Toward Freedom at Blumstein’s Department Store in Harlem, New York. Curry approached King with a seven-inch steel letter opener and drove the blade into the upper left side of his chest. King was rushed to Harlem Hospital where he underwent two-and-a-quarter hours of surgery to repair the wound. Doctors operating on the twenty-nine year old leader said, “Had Dr. King sneezed or coughed the weapon would have penetrated the aorta. . . . He was just a sneeze away from death” (Papers 4:499n).

Born in Adrian, Georgia, Curry moved to New York at the age of 20 to begin work as a cook and housekeeper. Shortly after her relocation, Curry developed paranoid delusions about the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Martin Luther King, Jr. and other civil rights leaders. After stabbing King, Curry was arrested at the scene and found carrying a loaded gun. When questioned by police at New York’s 28th precinct, she accused civil rights leaders of “boycotting” and “torturing” her as well as causing her to lose jobs and forcing her to change her religion (Curry, Statement to Howard Jones, 21 September 1958). Curry also suggested that dangerous connections were being forged between the civil rights movement and the Communist Party. After authorities informed her that she was being charged with felonious assault and possession of firearms, she reportedly replied, “I’m charging him [King] as well as he’s charging me…I’m charging him with being mixed up with the Communists” (“Dr. King’s Knifer,” 22 September 1962).

When King received word of his attacker’s mental state, he expressed his sympathy and issued a statement upon returning home to Montgomery, Alabama: “I am deeply sorry that a deranged woman should have injured herself in seeking to injure me. I can say, in all sincerity, that I bear no bitterness toward her and I have felt no resentment from the sad moment that the experience occurred. I know that we want her to receive the necessary treatment so that she may become a constructive citizen in an integrated society where a disorganized personality need not become a menace to any man” (Papers 4:513).

Following the stabbing, Curry was placed in Bellevue Hospital for observation and was found not competent to stand trial. On 20 October she was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic and committed to Matteawan State Hospital for the criminally insane.

A Martin Luther King Reading & Reference List

File:Martin-Luther-King-1964-leaning-on-a-lectern.jpg

Blogger’s Note—This is the fourth edition of the Martin Luther King Reading & Reference List. There are three additions for 2011. I believe this is best MLK Reference list on the web. ~ Neil Aquino

While it is always instructive to watch a rebroadcast or listen to a recording of the I Have A Dream speech, there is a next level for someone who wants to better understand Martin Luther King and his message.

Reverend King asked serious questions about America as a war criminal nation in Vietnam. He asked if America merited divine judgement as a wicked nation of racism and social inequality.  These questions are as relevant as ever as America is engaged in endless war and as income inequality grows.

It is within your power to bring about a better world. You have the ability to understand complex things. Learn about what a true prophet of justice Martin Luther King was in our society. After you learn more about Dr. King, take action yourself  to address the great pressing social problems of American life, and to address the neds of our world as a whole.

Here is an admittedly incomplete, but I hope useful, Martin Luther King viewing, visiting, listening, and reading list.

An excellent book is Martin & Malcolm & America—A Dream Or A Nightmare by James H. Cone. This book follows the words and the careers of both these men. The premiseof the book, which holds up in the telling, is that Dr. King and Malcolm Xwere not as far apart as often portrayed. Malcolm was a man with a broader vision than one of simple racial solidarity, and King was in many respects a fierce and almost apocalyptic critic of America.

( Below–Martin & Malcolm)

File:MLK and Malcolm X USNWR cropped.jpg

I’m glad to say I bought my copy of Cone’s book at the Martin Luther King Jr. National Historic Site in Atlanta, Georgia.  This site is operated by theNational Park Service. You can tour Martin Luther King’s boyhood home at this location. You’ll also want to tour the Auburn Avenue Historic District around the King home.

(Below—Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta. This was King’s home church.)

In Washington, when you visit the Lincoln Memorial (photo below), you can find a small marker indicating the exact spot where Rev. King made the ”Dream” speech. It is a good place to stand.

The best one volume work on King’s life is David Garrow’s Bearing The Cross—Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

Bearing The Cross was the 1987 Pulitzer Prize winner for biography.  You can’t help but feel the deep-sea like pressure on Dr. King in the final years of his life. I wondered if towards the end of his life King felt  death would be the only true escape from the exhaustion, the misunderstandings and the conflicts.

An interesting DVD is King–Man Of Peace In A Time Of War. Much of the hour long presentation is a rehash of King biography. What makes this special is a roughly 15 minute interview Dr. King did with afternoon television host Mike Douglas.  Mr. Douglas asked tough questions about Dr. King’s stance against the Vietnam War and about the effect of that opposition on the Civil Rights movement. Dr. King is calm, cool and collected. You could see how King was a leader who could speak anywhere and to anyone.

A solid explanation of Reverend King’s theology and a good analysis on the failure of Southern segregationists to mount an even more aggressive opposition to the Civil Rights Movement, can be found in A Stone Of Hope—Prophetic Religion And The Death Of Jim Crow by David L. Chappell. [Read more →]

NFL: Saturday Divisional Playoff Games Summary

Pittsburgh Steelers versus Baltimore Ravens

I’m sure that there are a lot of clichés you can use to make the Baltimore Ravens feel better, but they lost this game. This is not a game that the Pittsburgh Steelers won. The Pittsburgh Steelers played a disastrous first half of football. When your star player, Ben Roethlisberger, gives up a sack fumble deep in the field, you can’t expect to win. When your star running back, Rashard Mendenhall, coughs up the football, you can’t expect to win. The Baltimore Ravens turned each one of these turnovers into touchdowns. The Baltimore Ravens took a 21-7 lead into the locker room at halftime. There’s no way that the Baltimore Ravens should lose the game with this type of suffocating defense. No way. The only way that the Baltimore Ravens could lose this game would be if the offense turns the ball over. The Baltimore Ravens offense does exactly this. They turn the ball over not once, not twice but three times in the second half. Joe Flacco, who has been crowned many times over the last three years as the second coming of Joe Montana, proved that he is not ready. There are certain mistakes that you simply cannot make in a playoff game. His first down throw into double coverage was simply a bad decision, resulting in an interception. I simply cannot explain the fumbled snap which turns into another Ravens turnover. That simply cannot happen in the NFL. While everyone will focus on the two huge dropped passes by the Ravens wide receivers (Boldin drops a TD and Houshmanszadeh drops a first down ball on a 4th and 15 with a minute to go), I would like to focus on the first down throw to Todd Heap who is open over the middle. It is first and 10 at midfield. There is approximately 1 min. to go in the game. The Ravens have no timeouts. The Ravens are down by seven points and they need a touchdown. They only have 50 yards to go. They have Pro Bowl receivers and a Pro Bowl tight end. This is a ball that Joe Flacco needs to put directly on the receiver and he overthrows the receiver by 2-3 yards! This can’t happen if you want to win in the playoffs. The quarterback is the leader of the team. The quarterback has to lead the team through adversity. In my opinion, Joe Flacco let his team down.

Now contrast Joe Flacco’s performance to Ben Roethlisberger’s. I’m not sure if Big Ben made a major mistake in the second half. He was calm under pressure, able to find the open receiver. He took advantage of every opportunity that the Ravens gave to him. The Ravens defense really played well (Terrell Suggs had a monster game!). They only gave up a total of 263 total yards. Big Ben was sacked six times, yet somehow he made enough plays to win. Ben was the difference between winning and losing this game. Ben Roethlisberger carried his team to victory. Joe Flacco did not.

Green Bay Packers versus Atlanta Falcons

I really thought that Atlanta had a good opportunity to win this game. I thought if they were able to control the clock and make Aaron Rodgers drive the length of the field, the Atlanta Falcons had a good opportunity to win. Now, looking back at the game, I think that Eric Weems‘ 102 yard kickoff return actually hurt the Atlanta Falcons. Let’s look at that sequence of events again. The Green Bay Packers just completed a 13 play 81 yard drive. The Falcons defense must’ve been winded. The drive took almost 8 minutes. The Falcons defense needed a breather. They needed the Falcon offense to take a 4 or 5  minutes off the clock. Yet, Eric Weems explodes for 102 yards and takes only 14 seconds off the clock. The Green Bay Packers now take the ball on a 10 play 92 yard drive that eats up almost 6 minutes off the clock. The Packers score another touchdown. To me, this was a turning point in the game. These two extremely long drives allow Aaron Rodgers to get into a groove that very few quarterbacks ever see. Aaron Rodgers proved why he should be talked about, along with Tom Brady, for league MVP. He played a perfect game.

In my opinion, as in the case of Joe Flacco, when the Atlanta Falcons needed Matt Ryan to show up big, he failed. Two plays late in the second quarter killed the Atlanta Falcons’ opportunity to steal the momentum and get back into this game. The game is 14-14. The Atlanta Falcons are driving down the field. They’re deep in Packers’ territory. Michael Jenkins beats Tremont Williams on a double move. He is easily 5 yards behind Williams. Matt Ryan needs to throw a smoking hot laser shot to Jenkins. The ball has to get to Jenkins before Jenkins runs out of the back of the end zone and before the safety can rotate over the top. Finally, the ball has to get there before Williams can get underneath it. Instead of throwing the ball on a rope, Matt Ryan lofts it, which gives Williams an opportunity to get back into the play. Tremont makes an interception and kills a big Atlanta drive. Huge play. The Green Bay Packers take the ball down the length of the field and score a touchdown. On the very next possession, the Atlanta Falcons are desperate. Time is running out in the second quarter and momentum is clearly wearing a yellow and green jersey. If the Falcons kick a field goal, it will be approximately 53 yards. The Falcons are looking to make another 5-10 yards to make a field goal a little easier. They call a sprint out throw to the left. Matt Ryan, a right-handed quarterback, has to make an extremely difficult throw as he is moving to his left. He is a hair late with the throw to the outside. Anyone who plays Madden football knows that throws the outside are difficult under the best of circumstances. They’re nearly impossible to complete if you throw the ball late. The ball almost always gets intercepted. Tremont Williams undercuts the receiver, intercepts the ball and runs for a touchdown. For all practical purposes, the game is over. The Falcons are a very good team who happened to play a red-hot quarterback at the wrong time.

The Packers are looking more and more like the team to beat in the NFC.

The False Foundation Of the Conservative Tax Rant

The last several days (here and here), I’ve been dissecting this e-mail that I got from a friend of mine. The e-mail is something that we’ve all seen. It is an over the top treatise which is designed to get us emotionally charged over our tax burden. I have a few final thoughts on this e-mail.

The author of this e-mail is trying to tell us that $1 billion is just an enormous sum of money. On one hand, $1 billion is a lot of money. If the average American family takes home approximate $40,000 a year, $1 billion is 30,000 times greater than the average family’s median income. Yet, there’s over 300 million people in the United States. $1 billion is just a little over $3.33 per person. The average salary for the top 10 highest paid hedge fund managers is over $1 billion apiece. This is $1 billion per year for one man (one guy is getting paid over $2.5 billion per year). Exxon Mobil‘s quarterly income for the last quarter was $12.8 billion.

Things are expensive. We’ve seen conservatives rail against domestic spending. They talk about how spending is so wildly out of control but I have yet to see a conservative stand up and say we’re spending too much on the military. The F-22 raptor is one of our flying marvels. It is an amazing fighter jet. It is a third-generation Stealth fighter in our military arsenal. As we sit here and debate the wild spending in Congress let’s consider this third-generation Stealth fighter. No other country in the world has developed a first-generation Stealth fighter. As far as I know, no radar has been able to detect our first or second generation stealth planes yet, we continue to spend money on these technological marvels. Each one of these planes F-22 cost $187 million apiece. For $1 billion, you can have four planes. We won’t even talk about the more expensive fourth-generation F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Lightning II which is more expensive. Our nuclear aircraft carriers cost almost $200 million apiece. The budget for the Pentagon when you add in the supplemental spending on both Iraq and Afghanistan is almost $1 trillion.

We are overtaxed. This a common refrain heard from conservatives and the foundation of their anti-tax rhetoric. This refrain is basically a re-wording of Ronald Reagan’s famous, “the government is the problem.” Yet, I think that any thoughtful review of the tax code which show that our tax burden is actually less than it was 20 or 30 years ago. John F. Kennedy cut the upper tax rate from 90% down to approximate 70%. Nobody pays anywhere near this in federal income tax anymore. The average American currently pays approximately 18% of their income to the federal government. There is the myth that over 40% of Americans don’t pay any federal tax. That number is incorrect. More than 75% of Americans pay some federal tax. If you add up all of the taxes that Americans pay, this would include federal, state and local taxes, Americans pay $3.8 trillion or 27% of our gross domestic product. If you look at the 30 richest countries in the world we ranked 25th in tax burden. Only Mexico, Turkey South Korea and Japan have lower tax rates. So, it’s hard for me to believe that were overtaxed.

I know that many Americans believe that were paying more in taxes. The question is why? Why do Americans feel like the government is vacuuming up every last penny that we have? The problem is wages. Our wages have not kept up with expenses. We are paying more and making relatively less. Because we’re having more and more trouble making ends meet we start looking around for reasons why. The reason is our work is not being valued. Almost nobody is getting paid more, in absolute dollars, than they were paid 20 or 30 years ago. This is our problem in the US. We need to get a pay raise. Without a significant pay raise, conservatives will continue to whine about taxes as if that is the problem. In a nutshell, we are working harder and getting paid less for our efforts.