Where's the Outrage?

Tags: General by Neil Aquino
13 Comments »

So, these two dudes were in a plane and… Just watch the video. Totally cool.

Tags: NASA by ecthompson md
No Comments »

Melissa Harris-Perry is one of the most intelligent, thoughtful and dramatic people on the political scene.  She has moved from Princeton to Tulane. I suspect that NOLA will change. She is a force. In her latest article in The Nation she answers the question why we still need a Black History month.

Melissa Harris-Perry

From the Nation:

We are in the final hours of February 2011. These are the last moments of this year’s Black History Month. February is always my busiest month for travel and public lectures as I join dozens of other professors whose research takes on sudden relevance for four short weeks. Typically, I spend some time in February responding to queries about the origins of the month-long observance. Invariably, I am also asked to defend its continuing relevance.

Student reporter: Do we really need a separate black history month now that we have a black president?

Me: Can you name five important African-Americans, not including Martin Luther King Jr. and Barack Obama, and tell me something about their contributions to America?

Student reporter: (Silence)

Me: Yes, we still need Black History Month.

In these waning moments of yet another busy February I admit to feeling particularly defeated by our typical Black History Month approach, which tends to be rooted in a recitation of “little known black history facts” and the celebration of a few accomplished and brilliant individuals. Our contemporary political environment cries out for an urgent, collective immersion in accurate Americanhistory, including its complicated intersections with race and racism. I have a professional nerd fantasy in which I imagine every cable news program devoting a quarter of every hour to the study of American history. I can hear the ratings plummet, but I love the idea of taking just a few moments to inform the public about the broad outlines of our key historical moments, so that these moments cannot be so easily twisted, distorted and misused by ideological movements. Indulge the fantasy for a moment.

What might happen if Americans understood Revolutionary War history? Maybe it would be considerably harder for the Tea Party to convince voters that their anxieties about a president elected with 53 percent of the popular vote by an electorate that enjoys universal adult suffrage are “just the same” as the concerns of colonists who decried taxation without representation under the rule of an absolute monarch. No sustained engagement with The Federalist Papers could allow the narrow, simplistic assertions about the intent of the founding fathers so often present in Tea Party rhetoric. The Tea Party’s ability to deploy the symbols and language of patriotism requires broad and deep ignorance of American history. The American public is woefully unprepared to fact check their bold assertions that they are the keepers of the authentic national legacy. I do not mean to suggest that Revolutionary War history or The Federalist Papers reveal that America’s founders were actually progressive liberals, likely to have subscribed to The Nation. Rather, American history teaches us that the founders were complex, that the founding was contested and that any attempt to reduce American history to soundbite ideology is woefully inadequate. If we shared a deeper and more accurate understanding of our history we would not all be liberals, but perhaps we would be more careful.

While we clearly suffer from a national deficit of historical knowledge in general, we seem to be particularly uninformed about the histories of marginal people: black Americans, non-white immigrants, women of all races, workers and gay Americans. I suspect secession would seem less reasonable to those who had a clear understanding of American Civil War history. I believe Americans might be better equipped to recognize and appreciate the consequences of the racial angst directed at President Obama’s administration if they were better versed in the decades of backlash that followed Reconstruction. I am confident that serious study of American labor history would remind voters of all that is at stake in the current battles to maintain collective bargaining rights. I have no doubt that young women would feel more urgent about protecting their reproductive rights if they were more fully versed in the history of women’s struggle for equality. (more…)

Tags: Party Politics, Race by ecthompson md
No Comments »

First of all, let me preface my remarks by stating that I really don’t like Glenn Beck. It’s nothing personal. I have nothing against the way he combs his hair or against his success. I’m happy for anyone who is successful in the United States (if they have done it lawfully). The problem that I have a Glenn Beck is that he is a pseudo-intellectual. He has this chalkboard shtick that he does in which multiple non sequiturs are tied together. His whole deal, to me, seems to be manufactured to deceive instead of illuminate.

Now, with that as the background, Glenn Beck stated on his radio show yesterday how he wanted to set the record straight. Here’s what he said (making transcripts is much harder than it looks):

Beck: So I just want to make that clear. Cops, firefighters… I have no problem with teachers. Who doesn’t want their teachers to make the most amount of money? But, in a realistic, free enterprise sort of way.

Sidekick: We want to take care of our teachers, our cops are firefighters (crosstalk)

Beck: Absolutely. the American and I am no different than the average American. The average American wants to take care of their teachers, their cops, their firemen and police and their arghh, soldiers. That’s who they want to take care of. They protect us and they teach our kids. We want to protect them, take care of them. Not a problem with that. Never, never, have I had a problem with that. But it must be realistic. And we haven’t had to have this conversation, ever. Because the problem was going to be… It’s not just the firemen and everything else. It’s you. As well. You. Every taxpayer is going to go broke, or going to lose their 401(k)s or whatever you have if the United States and state after state goes bankrupt you lose everything. (audio courtesy of Media Matters)

Just for a second, let’s remember that Glenn Beck is a multimillionaire. He’s not one of us. Glenn Beck is not sitting at home trying to figure out how he’s going to pay the rent, pay his car note and keep food on the table. So, it is clear that he is different than every other American. Let’s move past this. I applaud him for saying that teachers, firefighters and police officers should get paid more. Then, though, he goes on to qualify his statement by saying that they should only get paid more in a “realistic” manner. What does that mean? Is he stating that these folks are now getting paid in an unrealistic manner? Is he stating that somehow collective bargaining is not a free enterprise system? By ending his statement with this apocalyptic “everybody’s going broke” type of statement, is he saying that teachers, firefighters and police officers should get paid less?

Click to Enlarge

Let’s be honest, the thought that America is broke is permeating the conservative airwaves. The Conservatives cannot stop talking about how broken and out of money the dederal and individual state governments are. They don’t seem to mention that unpaid-for tax cuts to the rich have sapped our cash supply. America has the money. The money is residing in the pockets of people like Glenn Beck.

Beck's thoughts on Teachers Salaries [ 1:29 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Tags: Budget, Media, Party Politics by ecthompson md
3 Comments »