Entries Tagged as 'Energy'

Western Governors are thinking about energy

From DailyKos (McJoan is on it again):

Recognizing the key role western states are going to take in the nation’s potential energy revolution, the Western Governors are weighing in with their recommendations for the Obama administration’s national energy policy, and for action that should be taken in the first 100 days.

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — The governors of the nation’s largest energy-producing states are encouraging President-elect Barack Obama to quickly adopt a national energy policy that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The bipartisan Western Governors’ Association has delivered Obama a four-page letter outlining what steps it believes his administration should take in his first 100 days in office to address the issue….

“We must not repeat the mistakes of the past,” says the letter signed by association chairman, Republican Gov. Jon Huntsman of Utah, and vice chairman, Democratic Gov. Dem Brian Schweitzer of Montana. “The future of our nation depends on it.”

Huntsman said Obama’s administration should listen to the WGA because its 19 states are responsible for 94 percent of the country’s onshore oil reserves, 66 percent of its coal reserves and 100 percent of its installed solar generation….he told The Associated Press.

The WGA is encouraging Obama to improve mass transportation, bring more fuel-efficient and near-zero emission vehicles on to the market and develop renewable resources such as wind and solar energy.

The governors propose an ambitious 100 day plan (pdf, via New West):

  1. Establish an aggressive and achievable national greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal that will put the United States on a path to contribute to global climate stabilization.
  2. Propose a mandatory national system for reducing greenhouse gas emissions that makes maximum use of market-based mechanisms. Revenue raised should support the energy policy principles in this letter and not be used as a means of sustaining or expanding general governmental operations.
  3. Aggressively pursue a national energy efficiency program to reduce existing and future energy demand and thereby reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
  4. Establish an oil import reduction goal that strengthens energy security and independence. Since nearly 90% of oil is used for transportation, propose a plan that
    • Brings more fuel efficient and near-zero emission vehicles into the market;
    • Increases the supply of domestically produced, low-carbon fuels;
    • Minimizes the economic and technological uncertainties inherent in deploying high efficiency vehicles and developing and using nonpetroleum transportation fuels;  and
    • Reduces vehicle miles travelled and increases mass movement of people and goods.
  5. :

  6. Create a substantial, long-term national public investment on the scale of tens of billions of dollars annually, and encourage at least the same investment from the private sector, to support the kind of basic and applied research and deployment of clean energy technology and infrastructure that will result in:
    • Near-zero greenhouse gas emissions from new coal-fired electricity generation in 10 years and from existing generation no later than 2030;
    • Dramatically increased energy from wind, solar, geothermal, hydro and biomass resources;
    • Expansion and upgrade of the electricity transmission grid and storage capabilities;
    • Advanced vehicle and battery technologies and alternative transportation fuels; and
    • Next generation energy efficiency technologies and practices.
  7. Ensure affordability for lower income energy consumers through energy efficiency and cost assistance programs.
  8. Provide for workforce development and clean energy jobs, adaptation to climate change impacts, reduced consumer impacts, particularly for low-incomeconsumers, and transition assistance to industries.

The AP is reporting that Huntsman and Schweitzer have already met with John Podesta to promote their proposal. They should carry some weight with the new administration. Even Huntsman, governing one of the nation’s reddest states, has been an active participant in the Western Climate Initiative, an effort of seven western states and four Canadian provinces to reduce greenhouse gases region-wide. It’s an ambitious effort, covering a good third of North America, geographically.

It’s a proposal that should spark the conversation on our new national energy policy.

Clean Coal

One catch phrase during the long election season was, of course, Clean Coal. Currently, when coal is burned to create energy, the coal gives off CO2 and sulfur. CO2 is a greenhouse gas…and sulfur isn’t good for the atmosphere either. So the question remains…how do we capture these compounds while still safeguarding the air that we breathe? A German company has a design, but it’s very expensive. My problem with this German model is the CO2. Their answer lies in buriying the danger really, really deep in the earth. Really? That’s the answer?. This seems like an answer from the mind of a cartoon character.

Articles:
What is clean coal technology?
‘Clean’ Coal? Don’t Try to Shovel That.
What the Heck Is “Clean Coal”? It depends whom you ask.

Obama wins third and final debate

I guess the question is how a presidential debate is won. There is no referee other than the American populace and the moderator does not stand up and call a time-out every time a candidate stretches the truth. So how do you win?

I guess the answer is to look presidential, (whatever that is). You need to look calm, cool and in complete command of the subject.

The tasks at the beginning of this debate were completely different for each candidate. Sen. John McCain needed to convince the American people that he has a viable plan to fix our economy. He needed to persuade the American people that he is on their side. He also needed to let them know that he is not only different than George W. Bush, but better. Finally, John McCain must convince us that all of the flailing around that we saw with the economy over the last several weeks has been merely an illusion. McCain had to prove to us that he knows what he is doing.


Sen. Barack Obama
, on the other hand, needed only to continue doing what he’s been doing. He needed to continue to show that he understands the economy and that his plan is better for the middle class. He also needed to combat the negative attacks and to get out of this debate without screaming, “I’m a terrorist.”

Unfortunately for the Republican ticket, John McCain had a nearly impossible task, whereas Barack Obama had a task that was easily within his grasp. John McCain looked angry, even frustrated at times. Barack Obama continued to look as if he is in charge and understands the issues. John McCain was not able to distance himself from George W. Bush. He stated that he was not George W. Bush, but never clearly articulated how his economic plan was different than something Bush would propose. Barack Obama skillfully disarmed the Bill Ayers issue. The ACORN allegations were never completely explained by John McCain. Once again, Barack Obama successfully articulated that his campaign has nothing to do with ACORN.

There were multiple times when Barack Obama had an opportunity to go for the jugular and he didn’t…not once. I think Barack Obama and his advisers decided that going directly after John McCain or Sarah Palin would make him appear petty. Maybe they did focus groups. I don’t know. But I do know that Barack Obama took the high road at every opportunity. At the same time, he did not cower from John McCain. He stood up for himself and his proposals. This may be why he won all three debates.

 

What’s Going On? Evening News Round-up

My picks from the day’s news:

  • One of my readers is not happy with my discussion of the Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin and teenage pregnancy. I’m sorry that he wasn’t happy and that he thought that I’m gutless. I wonder if it’s fair to talk about Palin the reformer? Maybe that is off-limits too.
  • I am still puzzled by Presidential hopeful John McCain’s refrain of “Drill, Baby, Drill.” Why is drilling a good thing? I don’t think that it is bad, but applause? Why?
  • Speaking of oil and drilling… OPEC is thinking about cutting production in order to keep the price of oil over $100 per barrel. Our friends the Saudi’s, have vowed to keep production at its current level. Well, that fills me with warm fuzzies.
  • There seems to be lots of reporters who are writing about the back-and-forth between the Obama camp and the McCain camp regarding lipstick on a pig. Of course, this distracts Americans away from the real issues. Our economy is in the toilet. We still don’t have a strategy for getting out of Iraq. We are no closer to Osama bin Laden. More and more of our troops are dying in Afghanistan as the Taliban returns. (Admiral Mullen stated that we are not winning in Afghanistan.) These are the issues that I want to hear about.
  • Lehman Brothers are desperately trying to restructure their debt and sell off whatever everything they can. They released their third-quarter earnings statements early in order to fend off criticism and speculation. They lost $3.9 billion last quarter. That is added to the $2 billion they lost in the first quarter of this year. Lehman Brothers have survived two World Wars and a Great Depression but may not be able to survive the deregulation in tax cuts by the Bush administration.
  • You knew it was going to happen sooner or later. Drudge, of the Drudge Report, has been on the sidelines. He really hasn’t made any headlines are breaking news. He really hasn’t done anything significant since the Clinton camp stopped feeding him information. Drudge completely botched the lipstick story. Is anyone surprised?
  • A new scandal is beginning to engulf the Department of the Interior. These are the kind of scandals that I like. It contains sex and drugs but, unfortunately, no rock ‘n roll. It does contain lots of money though.
  • EJ Donnie of the Washington Post asked the question, “Does the Truth Matter any More?” Nice OpEd.

The Sarah Palin Digest

palinbanner The Sarah Palin Digest

From
Think Progress.org

Think Progress has put together a document compiling what we know about Alaska Governor Sarah Palin (R), the vice presidential running mate of Senator John McCain. Here are the issues:

* Foreign Policy
* Earmarks
* Environment
* Energy
* Big Oil
* Science
* Women’s Rights
* Ethics
* Troopergate
* Radical Right
* Civil Rights
* Health Care
* Economy

Click here to comment on this report.

ON FOREIGN POLICY

Palin Hasn’t Given The War In Iraq Much Thought. Palin told the Alaska Business Monthly, “I’ve been so focused on state government, I haven’t really focused much on the war in Iraq. I heard on the news about the new deployments, and while I support our president, Condoleezza Rice and the administration, I want to know that we have an exit plan in place.” [Alaska Business Monthly, 3/1/07]

Palin Has Never Been To Iraq. In her only trip overseas, Palin visited Alaska National Guard troops stationed in Kuwait and Germany in July 2007. [AP, 7/25/07]

Palin Believes That The Iraq War Is A Task ‘From God.’ Speaking at the Wasilla Assembly of God church in June, Palin said that “our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God.” [Huffington Post, 9/2/08]

Palin Believes The Iraq War Was Fought Over Oil. “We are a nation at war and in many [ways] the reasons for war are fights over energy sources,” Palin told BusinessWeek in an interview. [BusinessWeek, 8/29/08]

Palin Didn’t Have A Passport Until 2007. Palin first obtained a passport in July 2007 for her trip to Kuwait and Germany to visit Alaska National Guard troops. Her only other trip outside of the United States was to Canada. A Palin spokeswoman had previously said that Palin had also been to Ireland, although it was actually just a “refueling stop” on her Germany/Kuwait trip. [New York Times, 8/29/08; Politico, 9/2/08]

ON EARMARKS

Palin Supported The Bridge To Nowhere. During her unveiling as McCain’s running mate, Palin claimed that she said, “Thanks, but no thanks” to federal funding for the Bridge to Nowhere. But in her 2006 campaign for governor, Palin repeatedly expressed support for the bridge project, saying Alaska should take advantage of earmarks “while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist.” [Anchorage Daily News, 10/22/06; Ketchikan Daily News, 8/9/06, 11/21/06]

Palin Obtained $27 Million In Earmarks As Mayor Of Wasilla. As mayor of Wasilla, AK, Palin “hired a private lobbyist to help the tiny town secure earmarks from [Sen. Ted] Stevens.” “The town obtained 14 earmarks, totaling $27 million between 2000-2003.” [Associated Press, 9/3/08]

ON THE ENVIRONMENT

Palin Denies Man-Made Global Warming. When asked for her “take on global warming,” Palin replied, “A changing environment will affect Alaska more than any other state, because of our location. I’m not one though who would attribute it to being man-made.” [Newsmax, 08/29/08]

Challenging ‘Uncertain Climate Models,’ Palin Is Suing To Lift Protected Status For Polar Bears. After a multi-year court battle, the Bush administration recognized in 2008 that polar bears are threatened with extinction by global warming. Announcing Alaska’s suit to block the listing, Palin said, “We believe that the listing was unwarranted and that it’s unprecedented to list a currently healthy population based on uncertain climate models.” [Reuters, 5/22/08]

Palin Established Illegal Fly-By Wolf Hunting Bounty. In 2007, Palin illegally established “a $150 bounty to the state sanctioned airborne wolf hunters as an added incentive to increase their kills,” soon overturned by the Alaska State Court. [Alaska Wildlife Alliance; Anchorage Daily News, 3/31/07]

ON ENERGY

Palin Is A Top Arctic Wildlife Refuge Drilling Advocate. Palin said she thinks McCain is “going to evolve into, eventually, supporting ANWR opening also” and “I’d like the opportunity to get to change his mind about ANWR.” [Kudlow & Co., 6/25/08]

Palin Opposes Lieberman’s Bill To Prevent Arctic Refuge Drilling. In a letter to Congress opposing the Arctic Wilderness Act (S. 2316), Palin wrote that “as a citizen of the United States” she believes “development [of the Refuge] should be authorized.” [Letter to Sen. Akaka, 11/9/07]

Palin Dismisses Alternative Energy. Palin said that “Congress needs to lift the ban on drilling” because “alternative-energy solutions are far from imminent and would require more than 10 years to develop.” [Charleston Post and Courier, 8/16/08]

Palin Believes It Is ‘God’s Will’ To Build A Natural Gas Pipeline. Speaking to the Wasilla Assembly of God church in June, Palin said, “I think God’s will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that,” referring to a $30 billion national gas pipeline project. [Huffington Post, 9/2/08]

[Read more →]

Real Life Beverly Hillbillies

beverly-hillbillies Real Life Beverly Hillbillies

Although Jed is long gone, Herb Geving is smiling all the way to the bank. Seems he found oil on his property in Stanley, North Dakota.

Maybe I should start drilling in my back yard. I’d probably cause an earthquake or a huge sink hole the size of Kansas!

Paris Hilton’s Rebuttal

So, who knew that Paris Hilton had a sense of humor? Who knew that it appears that she has a brain? She doesn’t attack John McCain but she does poke a stick at him. Her energy plan…wait. I’ll stop there. I’m not going to seriously consider a Paris Hilton energy plan. I can’t do it.

 
icon for podpress  Paris Hilton's response [1:50m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Are We Not Listening to Obama?

Great OpEd in the New York Times on Senator Barack Obama. It clearly needs to be read -

We have to have a talk about Barack Obama.

I know, I know. You’re upset. You think the guy you fell in love with last spring is spending the summer flip-flopping his way to the right. Drifting to the center. Going all moderate on you. So you’re withholding the love. Also possibly the money.

I feel your pain. I just don’t know what candidate you’re talking about.

Think back. Why, exactly, did you prefer Obama over Hillary Clinton in the first place? Their policies were almost identical — except his health care proposal was more conservative. You liked Barack because you thought he could get us past the old brain-dead politics, right? He talked — and talked and talked — about how there were going to be no more red states and blue states, how he was going to bring Americans together, including Republicans and Democrats.

Exactly where did everybody think this gathering was going to take place? Left field? (more… )

More later… I have a couple of trauma patients to take care of.

Another cool car - 230 mpg

3 wheeled electric car - Aptera.

Update: Oops. Gael pointed out that this car doesn’t go 230 miles per hour but instead goes 230 miles per gallon.

From Gizmo:

We heard rumblings of the electric three-wheeled Aptera over a year ago but now the company has opened up an annoying and overwrought website soliciting “reservations,” meaning you can plunk down $500 and get the right to buy either the all-electric or plug-in diesel hybrid model. The good news is, there’s a working prototype with specs that are jaw-dropping. (more…)

 
icon for podpress  Totally cool car [1:45m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Blackout in South Florida

I thought that President Bush as going to fix the electrical grid?  What happened to that plan?  I’m guessing that someone got rich and we got the shaf$.

Please note in the story below that the writers of this story go out of their way not to blame the nuclear plant for any of these problems.  I find that kind of interesting.

Video to follow.

————-

From Miami Herald:

At its peak, the main power failure left as many as four million people without electricity in South Florida, along the Gulf Coast, in the Orlando area and elsewhere around the state, according to state officials.

The outage was caused by a switch failure at Florida Power & Light’s Flagami substation — not in the utility’s nuclear plant at Turkey Point, as reported earlier by some media outlets, FPL President Armando Olivera said during an evening news conference.  (more…)

Miners hurt in rescue

I have a question, what is the Number One thing in rescue operations?  You already have some folks that many be injured if not dead.  What is the number 1 thing?  No one else gets hurt!!  In Oklahoma City bombing, personnel got hurt rushing into a building that was not safe.  A nurse was killed.  Now, 3 of the rescue miners are confirmed dead, 6 are injured.

This whole situation stinks to high heaven.  Nothing seems to be going right.  These deaths make me physically sick.

BTW, I took Geology.  What the hell is a “bump”?  What is that?

————–

From CNN.com:

Three rescue workers were killed and six others injured Thursday night during an apparent “seismic bump” while attempting to reach six miners trapped since an August 6 mine collapse, according to state and hospital officials.

The third death was confirmed by a Utah Department of Natural Resources spokeswoman.

All of the rescue workers in the mine at the time of the incident have been accounted for and removed, said Rich Kulczewski of the Mine Safety and Health Administration.  (more…)

Gore’s energy use

Finally, a bit of reality on Gore and Global Warming.

———

From the Center for American Progress:

On Sunday, Vice President Al Gore’s global warming film An Inconvenient Truth won two Academy Awards, including Best Documentary Feature (watch a video montage of Gore at the Oscars). Just as conservative critics blasted the Grammy-winning Dixie Chicks, many are claiming that An Inconvenient Truth was honored simply because Hollywood agrees with Gore’s views. The truth is, two years ago, global warming was still considered a fringe issue to many. Today, the debate is over — Americans overwhelmingly agree that the climate crisis exists and that we must act now to reverse it. An Inconvenient Truth had a profound impact on how Americans view the issue of global warming. Al Gore deserved this award. Now, he’s set to launch “a series of worldwide concerts to focus on the threat of climate change, with a powerhouse lineup from the Red Hot Chili Peppers to Snoop Dogg to Bon Jovi.” The 24-hour event on 7/07/07 is part of a campaign called Save Our Selves (SOS) — The Campaign for a Climate in Crisis. “In order to solve the climate crisis, we have to reach billions of people,” Gore said today. “The climate crisis will only be stopped by an unprecedented and sustained global movement.” (For more, check out our blog dedicated to global warming, Climate Progress.) [Read more →]

 
icon for podpress  Countdown - Gore, Global Warming [6:16m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

The Errington Thompson Show 1/27/07

More verbage on the this show later.  We do discuss the State of the Union.  We talk with Spenser Boyer from the Center for American Progress.

Remember I’m on iTunes and several other podcasting services.

 
icon for podpress  The Errington Thompson Show 1-27-07 [52:12m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

SOTU

Well, I’ve been gone for the last few days as my parents are in town visiting, but I’m back tonight for a brief posting.

SOTU address tonight, which in my house means one thing. Drinking party!!! It’s evolved over the past few years, but this year had decorations, door prizes, drinking game rules, snarkalicious food and fun for all.

The rules are modified from the rules here, although, imho, mine were better. We had Iraq Study Group Fruit Cocktail, Undocumented Immigrant-made churros (yum), Sam Adams (a beermaker AND a patriot) beers of all varieties, Mexican beers (illegally immigrated, I’m sure), pretzels, and much, much more. Elton was unable to make the gathering tonight, but I still look forward to meeting him in person.

Last year, after the festivities, George Bush blew up my water heater. Tonight, as I get ready for bed, all of my plumbing is secure. I wish I could say that I feel that the nation is as secure. (Nice segue, huh?)

Same crap, different day. Well, actually, a different sequence of the same crap, for a different day, but still, yawn. Is it just me, or did he seem to be trying to be exuberant and determined?

It was a bit different that he spoke of a domestic agenda first. Now, it was pretty lame of him to try to score points by shilling for things that were in the Democratic Party’s “First 100 Hours Agenda”, but whatever. I guess if I were him, I wouldn’t want to lead with Iraq either. By the midway point, when many people may have been snoozing safely. he moved into the foreign affairs agenda. By this point, I was so buzzed that I couldn’t keep track of my drinking rules anymore, but I think he said Iraq or Iran about a billion times, which is coincidentally, about the same number as the number of Iraqi civilians that have died so far due to this war. But I digress. Beer does that to me.

Then, after depressing everybody and trying to say that everything was going fine up until that mosque got blown up, he moved in to the feel-good section of the speech to bring it on home. That’s right, the special invited guests. Who can criticize Dikembe Mutombo, or Baby Einstein, or a “Subway Hero”, or an actual military hero? Nope, it’s all feel-good, teflon-based applause leading up to a “the state of the union is strong” and a “good night everybody, it’s been great to be here!!!”

But then the smackdown by Senator Jim Webb (D-VA), as video-linked below, by E. Other drunken friends at our party, who missed the rebuttal, asked me what he said. I summarized it as saying, “1. My military credentials are beyond reproach. 2. Past Republican presidents have managed to do the right things in times of war. 3. If you don’t do likewise, we will show you the way.”

For what it’s worth, I thought it was the best Democratic Response to a SOTU that I have seen in many years. Good job, Senator Webb.

Redford - National Arctic Refuge

The Bush Administration continues to try to give money to their friends in the oil bid’nes’.  Other attempt to drill.  This must be the 5th or 6th time they have tried. 

Outstanding Robert Redford appeal.

[gv data="ewbHBJkhz6g"][/gv]

NYT editoral 5/30/06 -

Sherwood Boehlert, the moderate Republican who will retire this fall, observed on the floor of the House last week that despite polls showing conservation as the ”preferred option” among Americans worried about high gas prices and oil dependency, ”this Congress has not voted on a single conservation measure since gasoline hit $3 a gallon.” At which point his colleagues voted (yet again) to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling in the misguided but apparently unshakable belief that a nation that uses one-quarter of the world’s oil while possessing 3 percent of its reserves can drill its way to lower prices. [Read more →]

Do you believe in an oil coincidence?

 

oil%20pipe%20lines Do you believe in an oil coincidence?

 

Just as oil prices appear to be stabilizing, a major oil pipeline has to be shut down in Alaska.  It is just coincidence?  Wasn’t Congress getting ready to hold hearings on the outrages profits at the oil companies are raking in?  Maybe I’m just being paranoid.

Cool Homes

ecthompson: Once a month, Christa Wagner from the Sierra Club has agreed to post a commentary on my blog and to read one on my show.  Here’s her post -

Nothing threatens the future of our planet, the security of our nation, or the health of our air, water and wildlands more than the way we produce and consume energy. It seems that everywhere you turn lately, global warming is in the news. Time Magazine devoted a whole issue to it, while Newsweek and Vanity Fair came out with cover stories. Suddenly, we’re waking up and realizing that it’s time to do something—now.

The good news is that solutions are already out there, from the personal level to a much larger political scale. So today we’ll start by looking at some simple things we can all do to make our homes and lifestyles more energy efficient.

Did you know that about 20% of all energy in the U.S. is used in the home? Here are some energy saving tips from the Sierra Club—and they won’t just lower your global warming pollution, they’ll lower your energy bills, too:

• Over half of energy costs go to heating and cooling your house. Installing weather-stripping on your doors and windows is simple and will make a big difference.
• When it’s cold out, turning the thermostat down just 5 degrees can take 10% off of your energy bill.
• When it’s hot, try using ceiling fans: they consume a fraction of the energy it takes to run an air conditioner.
• It’s a good thing to turn lights off when you leave a room, but an even better move is to buy energy-efficient light bulbs, which you can get at any hardware store. A typical family can save $60 a year by installing just 5 fluorescent energy-saving bulbs where lights are used a lot.
• 20% of home energy goes to heating water. One thing you can do is replace your water heater with an Energy Star model, which uses much less energy, or cover your existing water heater with in an insulation blanket until you’re ready to replace it. Another trick is to install a flash-water heater, which is used a lot in Europe, and can save you up to 50% . It also saves a lot of room, since they are much smaller than a conventional water heater. And the best option is a solar-heater on your roof—tax credits and energy savings mean that this technology pays for itself in just a few years.

Of course, there are many more things you can do to help make sure you’re doing your part at home. On the Sierra Club’s website, at Sierraclub.org/Coolhome you can download the “Cool Home Checklist,” which can help you see what you’re already doing right and where you’ve got room to improve. We even have a virtual tour, where you can walk through a real house with Sierra Magazine’s answer man, Mr. Green. You’ll learn how to save money, and help chip away at a threat that faces us all–global warming http://www.sierraclub.org/coolhome/.

Now, if 20% of the nation’s energy is used in the home, you may be wondering about the other 80%. In addition to Cool Homes, the Sierra Club is working with mayors across the U.S. in a “Cool Cities” campaign, where cities can take three easy steps to reduce their global warming pollution, from hybrid car fleets to green buildings to solar and wind power. Over 200 mayors all over the country have already signed up. So after you’ve done your part at home, you can use our website to contact your mayor and make sure your city is moving towards a smart energy future too. Because the solutions are already out there, and now it’s time for us to put words into action.

This has been Christa Wagner with the Sierra Club.
The full tip sheet and a virtual tour is available online at http://www.sierraclub.org/coolhome/

Energy Security - A thoughtful appoach

Energy Security in the 21st Century: A New National Strategy 

Participants:
Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State, and Principal, The Albright Group, LLC
Carol Browner, former Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, and Principal, The Albright Group, LLC
John D. Podesta, President and Chief Executive Officer, Center for American Progress

“We are addicted to oil, and the oil is coming from the most dangerous places in the world,” said former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright at a panel today, hosted by the Center for American Progress. Emphasizing the importance of energy security in U.S. foreign policy, the event coincided with the release of a new report titled “Energy Security In the 21st Century.”

The report was produced by the National Security Task Force on Energy, a diverse group of politicians, policy experts, and academics. John Podesta, President of the Center for American Progress, introduced the report and joined Albright on the panel. Joining them on the panel were former EPA Administrator Carol Browner and former Congressman Tom Downey.

Podesta’s opening remarks highlighted the growing threat that a mismanaged energy security strategy poses. Pointing out that the U.S. addiction to oil has increased even as oil has become more expensive, he said that the U.S. is compromising its foreign policy objectives by funding unstable and hostile regimes. Podesta also called climate change “a profound national security problem” that could cause significant instability in many parts of the world. Proliferation associated with nuclear energy and a vulnerable global energy infrastructure were also cited as threats.  (For more click here)

Short-sighted and short-term solutions to the energy security problem will not be enough. “There is no magic wand. We have to develop a comprehensive approach,” Albright urged. The released report details elements of a comprehensive solution, including a substantial commitment to reducing dependency on foreign oil. According to Podesta, “cellulosic ethanol is the most promising path forward for getting us off our addiction to oil.”

Browner, in addition to improving our biofuels capacity, called for pragmatic approaches to nuclear and coal power, emphasizing safety, and working in concert with a national carbon trading system. “The idea that we are going to drill our way out of the problem,” she stressed, “is wrong.”  more

Who killed the Electric Car?

I really don’t know enough about electric cars.  I need to learn more.  The following is a commentary from CNN.com by Alexandra Paul

LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) — I drive an electric car. Not a hybrid — a gasoline-powered car that gets some help from an electric motor — but a full electric vehicle. I plug it in at night and can drive 100 miles the next day and go faster than 80 mph on the highway.

So don’t think “golf cart”; these cars have power and pick-up.

While you won’t see many electric cars on the road, they’ve been around longer than you might think.

In 1900, electric cars outsold both gasoline and steam vehicles because electric cars didn’t have the vibration, noise and dirtiness associated with gas vehicles. But soon afterward — with the discovery of Texas crude oil that reduced the price of gasoline, the invention of the electric starter in 1912 that eliminated the need for a hand crank, and the mass production of internal combustion engine vehicles by Henry Ford — the electric vehicle went the way of the horse and buggy.

The energy crisis in the 1960s and 1970s revived interest briefly. There was another push in 1990, when General Motors Corp. unveiled the (ineptly named) Impact, a sporty, aerodynamic electric car prototype.

In 1998 the California Air Resources Board decided that if a car company could make such a car, it should, and mandated that 2 percent of vehicles sold in the state in 1998 must be emission-free, with that number rising to 10 percent by 2003.

Since California is a huge market, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Chrysler, Ford and GM started building electric vehicles — about 5,000 were manufactured. But by 2005 the mandate had been eviscerated because of pressure from those same car companies, and 4,000 perfectly good electric vehicles were crushed.

But did car companies really want electric cars to succeed? The success of electric vehicles would have threatened the status quo and core business models of two of the world’s biggest industries — oil and automobile. It is more expedient for these companies to give lip service to hydrogen in an attempt to appear “green.” But hydrogen is a technology that experts say is decades away.  [Read more →]

What Energy Policy?

I began thinking about what President Bush said about our need for an energy policy, a comprehensive energy policy. Let’s review. We had an Oil Crisis in the late 1970’s. Jimmy Carter was in office. He started a conservation policy. He installed solar panels on the White House didn’t he? He increased emission standards.  Then America had 17 years of Republican presidents and 8 years of a Democratic pres. What policy did the Reagan and Bush, the greater, put forward? (Besides keep gas prices low and mine more and drill more.) Early August, both houses of Congress passed an energy bill that seems to me to be more of the same. Where was the comprehensive energy policy we were promised? Moneys to upgrade the electrical grid - where were they?