It’s a cluster. That’s what they said, I paraphrased a little. This op-ed article in the New York Times needs to be read. These GI’s acknowledge what the Bush Administration and those Fox guys will not. We aren’t doing any more good over there. Period.
This is a GREAT Op-ED which will be denounced by the Right and Praised by the Left. Please note that the Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin and John Warner, former Chairman, have just returned from Iraq. They had a lot to say but the purpose of the surge was to allow for an Iraqi political settlement. That hasn’t happened. It also doesn’t look like it will happen anytime soon.
Update: Tucker weighted in on this issue. Tucker has 2 points. First, he’s not sure if it is “right” for active military to comment on the war. Second, the soldiers have the nerve to suggest that they have a clue what Iraqi’s think.
Tucker forgets that this is still a free country. Anyone should be allow to express their opinion. To Tucker’s second point, we have no idea how many Iraqis these soldiers came in contact with. We don’t know if they spoke with other GI’s in other parts of Iraq to get a broad cross section of opinion. As we have seen in the our own national polling, you don’t have to have a huge sample size in order to get a good sense of what is happening. Really, none of this matters to Tucker, he give the viewer the impression that GI’s should shut up and fight.
Of course, Tucker is wrong. Enjoy the video.
———
From NYT:
VIEWED from Iraq at the tail end of a 15-month deployment, the political debate in Washington is indeed surreal. Counterinsurgency is, by definition, a competition between insurgents and counterinsurgents for the control and support of a population. To believe that Americans, with an occupying force that long ago outlived its reluctant welcome, can win over a recalcitrant local population and win this counterinsurgency is far-fetched. As responsible infantrymen and noncommissioned officers with the 82nd Airborne Division soon heading back home, we are skeptical of recent press coverage portraying the conflict as increasingly manageable and feel it has neglected the mounting civil, political and social unrest we see every day. (Obviously, these are our personal views and should not be seen as official within our chain of command.)
The claim that we are increasingly in control of the battlefields in Iraq is an assessment arrived at through a flawed, American-centered framework. Yes, we are militarily superior, but our successes are offset by failures elsewhere. What soldiers call the “battle space” remains the same, with changes only at the margins. It is crowded with actors who do not fit neatly into boxes: Sunni extremists, Al Qaeda terrorists, Shiite militiamen, criminals and armed tribes. This situation is made more complex by the questionable loyalties and Janus-faced role of the Iraqi police and Iraqi Army, which have been trained and armed at United States taxpayers’ expense.
A few nights ago, for example, we witnessed the death of one American soldier and the critical wounding of two others when a lethal armor-piercing explosive was detonated between an Iraqi Army checkpoint and a police one. Local Iraqis readily testified to American investigators that Iraqi police and Army officers escorted the triggermen and helped plant the bomb. These civilians highlighted their own predicament: had they informed the Americans of the bomb before the incident, the Iraqi Army, the police or the local Shiite militia would have killed their families. [Read more →]

Tucker - GI's speak out [6:18m]:
Play Now |
Play in Popup |
Download
Tags: Bush Administration, Mess O'Potamia (Iraq/Iran/Israel/Palestine), Military by ecthompson
1 Comment »